I ran into this while trying to reproduce the issue:

At the lowest levels:

This needs a lot more work, but here's very roughly where I'm trying to go with this:

Left Nav

See also PHI1275. Now that Phriction supports relative references in [[ ... ]] syntax, moves should be able to modify those references.

• This feature was originally added in D1378.
• This feature was accidentally broken by D11169.
• In D19661, I removed the nonfunctional remnants of D1378.

contentID on Document should probably not be nullable. We can generate a Document PHID first, save the Content with the right Document PHID, then save the Document with the content ID. Deleted/moved/stub documents still have Content, I'm pretty sure -- oh, except we can't do, this because Content uses documentID, not documentPHID. So maybe kick the can down the road.

This doesn't have a repro and will probably be fixed via rewrite / modernization in T13077 anyway.

"Draft" will get a writeup in T13077 shortly.

It's plausible that we might support this some day, but there's no clear pathway forward and no support mana behind this feature so I'm going to banish this task to the shadow realm. Herald provides a workaround in at least some cases.

I suppose the approach proposed above gets a questionable result here:

After actually looking at the code, it looks like null can already be returned and works, it's just kind of wrong for some objects (like Dashboards) because they really do have a default policy -- it's just hard-coded.

I'm going to tentatively put this (the Phriction rule, specifically) into T13130 for this week although I'm not sure how much work getting getDefaultPolicyForObject() to return the root document policy is and maybe that's Unbelievably Difficult. Let me take a quick look at that and you can either run with it or I can pick it up if it's some kind of weird arcana.

The corresponding support ticket was likely addressed by these changes. The remaining stuff here is still planned, but probably not moving forward any time soon.

Ah thanks!

The non-bold ones also open in a new tab.

Oh! Yes. Sort of.

Just curious, but is the bold effect intentional in the "No Encoding Relative" scenario?