Feature RequestExperimental
ActivePublic

Properties

Description

This task was filed through the "New Feature Request" form.

Recent Activity

Today

chad added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

But if you say "Haskell" you may have to wait a minute.

Sat, Mar 25, 1:27 AM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

Raw HTTP is actually perfect for me! Thank you!

Sat, Mar 25, 12:50 AM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

But if you say "Haskell" you may have to wait a minute.

Sat, Mar 25, 12:46 AM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

Maybe easier would be for you to tell me what language you want to use and I'll just write you a snippet which encodes a request?

Sat, Mar 25, 12:45 AM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

The page implies that all I should need to do is POST up, for example, the following:

Sat, Mar 25, 12:38 AM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

To be clear though, I still haven't figured out how to actually put in a POST body. It's fine to use URL params for something like differential.querydiffs, but I can imagine the problems I'll run into with URL length when doing harbormaster.sendmessage (especially when reporting a bunch of unit test and linting results).

Sat, Mar 25, 12:15 AM · Conduit, Feature Request

Yesterday

epriestley added a commit to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests: rP3cdabb9588b0: Provide a hint that submitting a Conduit call shows you how to encode….
Fri, Mar 24, 8:15 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a commit to T11050: Allow resigning from a review you are not directly responsible for: rP24b6c7d7186a: Allow users to resign if they have authority over any reviewer.
Fri, Mar 24, 8:14 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Differential, Feature Request
epriestley added a revision to T11050: Allow resigning from a review you are not directly responsible for: D17558: Allow users to resign if they have authority over any reviewer.
Fri, Mar 24, 8:07 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Differential, Feature Request
epriestley added a revision to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests: D17557: Provide a hint that submitting a Conduit call shows you how to encode particular parameters.
Fri, Mar 24, 7:37 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

Yeah, there's no real hint about that in the UI to suggest that the box will update, and it's easy to miss since it looks nearly identical after it updates. I'll add a piece of hint text to hopefully make it more clear.

Fri, Mar 24, 7:32 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

OH, that only happens if you do the human-readable option. I didn't notice that little box at the bottom had changed amidst the giant blob of json that the call returned.

Fri, Mar 24, 7:31 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

Oh, maybe we could make this more clear. Here's how to use the examples to figure out how to make a call:

Fri, Mar 24, 7:23 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

The good news though is with that hint I seem to have it working without even needing to POST: https://phabricator.myurl.com/api/differential.querydiffs?api.token=api-TOKEN&ids[0]=5

Fri, Mar 24, 7:21 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

I can definitely try either of those two options, but to my point, it wasn't obvious to me from the documentation:

Fri, Mar 24, 7:13 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

(Kicking Documentation off because this would just be another tab next to PHP / cURL / arc in Conduit, not static documentation.)

Fri, Mar 24, 7:06 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley edited projects for T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests, added: Conduit; removed Documentation.
Fri, Mar 24, 7:06 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.

Can you use a service like https://requestb.in with curl?

Fri, Mar 24, 7:05 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
chad added a project to T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests: Documentation.
Fri, Mar 24, 6:56 PM · Conduit, Feature Request
mbenua-mparticle created T12447: Missing documentation for crafting raw Conduit API requests.
Fri, Mar 24, 6:42 PM · Conduit, Feature Request

Thu, Mar 23

epriestley added a comment to T12438: Unable to query tasks from multiple projects in maniphest advanced .

With subprojects, #project changed to mean "that project, and all its descendant projects", but any(...) and not(...) still mean "just the parameter, exactly". I think viewerprojects() and projects(user) are also "just the parameter".

Thu, Mar 23, 6:33 PM · Projects, Maniphest, Search, Feature Request
chad merged task T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup into T2849: Implement alternate markup engines (Markdown, reStructuredText, ...).
Thu, Mar 23, 5:56 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

Well we also have a lunch today.

Thu, Mar 23, 5:45 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

We could probably ship it (.md in Diffusion rendering as GitHub Flavored Markdown) this week -- it wouldn't be perfect, but we do have total freedom there to iterate as we find cases we're missing there -- it's just a pretty hard sell as a priority for me relative to the development cost. Obviously it would be nice if you bring in your repository to Phabricator and the README.md renders perfectly instead of rendering mostly-okay-but-a-bit-buggy, but it's hard for me to imagine we're losing many users there.

Thu, Mar 23, 5:44 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

Having markdown rendered in documentation as expected probably alleviates 90% of my concerns. At least, having to retype or reformat large chunks of text is un-cool and arduous. Learning some new markup, less so. But it sounds like thats years away.

Thu, Mar 23, 5:37 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

My anecdote here is Betamax vs. VHS. Yes, one is superior, the other has 95% of the market. I believe we're both right, but weigh certain issues differently. I see the new user coming from GitHub as the more important customer, as it leads to growth. The more things are different in Phabricator, the steeper the climb. You're right from a technical standpoint, and I do believe Remarkup is superior, so I'm stuck.

Thu, Mar 23, 5:35 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

I think the two goals are sufficiently in conflict and the value of supporting these rules is so low that it probably isn't worth the effort to try to get it right most of the time.

Thu, Mar 23, 5:24 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

Maybe a different question is, what percentage of block of Remarkup here include code-related discussions. I'm not saying rendering those well shouldn't be a high-priority, I just see Remarkup used for much much more (task discussions, documents, conpherence, etc).

Thu, Mar 23, 5:13 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

Are you strictly saying both goals here are not attainable?

Thu, Mar 23, 5:10 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
20after4 added a comment to T12438: Unable to query tasks from multiple projects in maniphest advanced .

I can confirm that In Any: does not seem to include subprojects. I tried to make some sense of the way the project search functions work but it's pretty complicated.

Thu, Mar 23, 4:54 PM · Projects, Maniphest, Search, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup.

My viewpoint is that Markdown was developed for writing first-party blog posts, not for technical discussions about software.

Thu, Mar 23, 4:53 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
chad reopened T11189: Add more Markdown Italics support to Remarkup as "Open".

Just going to reopen this as a wishlist item. Italics/Bold here is probably the biggest requests for cross-functionality Remarkup <-> Markdown I'd personally have. And at least in your test cases, it seems even GitHub fails at them (and CommonMark), though Slack does not, so I think these are workable in the general sense, just will likely come with lost of test cases and regex support. I think correctness of expectation is your main concern (and the maintenance cost), not adhering to a "spec"?

Thu, Mar 23, 4:34 PM · Remarkup, Feature Request
epriestley added a comment to T12335: Ability to lock a task to prevent further edits.

@beber, please file a new task with reproduction instructions that work on a clean install if you believe you've found a bug.

Thu, Mar 23, 12:33 AM · Maniphest, Feature Request
beber added a comment to T12335: Ability to lock a task to prevent further edits.
Thu, Mar 23, 12:30 AM · Maniphest, Feature Request

Wed, Mar 22

chad renamed T12435: Add support for spaces in Phriction from "Add support for spaces in phriction" to "Add support for spaces in Phriction".
Wed, Mar 22, 11:20 PM · Phriction, Feature Request
kristo.mario added a comment to T12435: Add support for spaces in Phriction.

Yeah, we kind of fake that now by offering an index page on Phriction welcome with major projects being there on "root" level.

Wed, Mar 22, 9:32 PM · Phriction, Feature Request
chad added a project to T12435: Add support for spaces in Phriction: Phriction.
Wed, Mar 22, 9:20 PM · Phriction, Feature Request
chad added a comment to T12435: Add support for spaces in Phriction.

I think we should just move Phriction to being a full CMS with different top-level hierarchies, which could be space aware. Just implementing Spaces doesn't make much sense otherwise.

Wed, Mar 22, 9:20 PM · Phriction, Feature Request
chad closed T11865: "Aleo" does not include cyrillic characters as "Resolved" by committing rP5e16e460396e: Remove "Aleo" as specialized font for headers.
Wed, Mar 22, 4:57 PM · FreeBSD, Feature Request
chad added a revision to T11865: "Aleo" does not include cyrillic characters: D17535: Remove "Aleo" as specialized font for headers.
Wed, Mar 22, 4:51 PM · FreeBSD, Feature Request
epriestley closed T11050: Allow resigning from a review you are not directly responsible for as "Resolved" by committing rP891355297074: Store "resigned" as an explicit reviewer state.
Wed, Mar 22, 4:50 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Differential, Feature Request
aklapper removed a project from T12438: Unable to query tasks from multiple projects in maniphest advanced : Typeahead.
Wed, Mar 22, 3:05 PM · Projects, Maniphest, Search, Feature Request
ruslan_a created T12438: Unable to query tasks from multiple projects in maniphest advanced .
Wed, Mar 22, 2:41 PM · Projects, Maniphest, Search, Feature Request
chad closed T12436: New users do not easily find the way to comment Maniphest tasks as "Invalid".

No interest from the upstream (we don't take design suggests as feature requests), you are welcome to fork Phabricator to provide these locally if you need.

Wed, Mar 22, 2:30 PM · Feature Request
epriestley added a revision to T11050: Allow resigning from a review you are not directly responsible for: D17531: Store "resigned" as an explicit reviewer state.
Wed, Mar 22, 1:49 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Differential, Feature Request
stevex created T12436: New users do not easily find the way to comment Maniphest tasks.
Wed, Mar 22, 10:30 AM · Feature Request
kristo.mario created T12435: Add support for spaces in Phriction.
Wed, Mar 22, 9:32 AM · Phriction, Feature Request

Tue, Mar 21

epriestley closed T12433: Developer as "Invalid".
Tue, Mar 21, 11:48 PM · Feature Request
imapsystem8 created T12433: Developer .
Tue, Mar 21, 11:38 PM · Feature Request
friesenschrauber added a comment to T12430: Stop cutting of Mail History for new Tasks.

Alright chad, from T8783 it seemed like Nuance was still far away, but 3 months doesn't sound that bad.
As suggested I commented on our use case for Nuance. I think we can probably stop annoying @epriestley with that Diff and I'll just patch it on my own installation while Nuance is still in development which is probably easier for all of us.

Tue, Mar 21, 5:52 PM · Feature Request