This was resolved as part of T13630. I didn't actually put it in the UI anywhere, but all requests will now originate from 13.56.71.101, and this isn't likely to change given the wind-down of Phacility hosting.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 3 2022
Feb 5 2021
See also PHI1987 for another case of this.
May 25 2020
Committer identities ... they're currently stored in a JSON blob so there's no efficient way to query them.
That was sufficient to get what I needed, thanks so much.
May 24 2020
Is there a way to find which object(s) an (unmapped) identity was discovered on?
May 23 2020
Is there a way to find which object(s) an (unmapped) identity was discovered on? After a rebuild-identities, I have an empty string identity and a couple asdf-style garbage ones. I'd like to find the source of them and either fix them there or see the context to understand the appropriate identity mapping.
May 21 2020
I think (?) this was pretty much resolved by the last round of changes. See T13291 for some followups.
May 1 2020
Thanks! I didn't know it could be done from the web UI.
Apr 30 2020
You can open the revision in the web UI and "Request Review". You can use arc diff --browse ... to open the web UI automatically.
We just found a real issue with this, different from what I mentioned above: We had an issue with our CI machine, and to fix it we needed to make a diff. But as the CI machine is not working, the diff won't build, which means we can't accept the diff that will solve the issue.
Is there a way to disable this option via a config in the server or a CLI parameter?
Feb 13 2020
Feb 12 2020
Feb 4 2020
Nov 21 2019
Nov 20 2019
Perfect; thanks!
In the general case:
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but now that this is done, how do I actually map between Phabricator users and VCS user strings, in an existing Diffusion repo?
Nov 19 2019
I think this doesn't have anything actionable left, see T13444 for some followups. This feature probably isn't 100% perfect quite yet, but I think remaining work is just cleanup.
Nov 4 2019
Oct 31 2019
Oct 25 2019
Jun 28 2019
Any update on when this is going to reach stable? We're ~16 weeks past the earlier estimate...
Jun 19 2019
May 10 2019
May 9 2019
PHI1224 describes a somewhat-adjacent situation: an install would like a way for external automated tooling to reference source files and generate editor links for them.
Apr 27 2019
Apr 14 2019
Mar 27 2019
(Sorry, typo'd my own name into another @ep....)
Mar 7 2019
It seems that newer versions of git have become more aggressive at detecting binary changes as moves + renames, because my install is now hitting this on a very frequent basis
Feb 28 2019
You will soon be able to give builds different "Hold Drafts" behaviors. See T13258.
Feb 19 2019
Feb 15 2019
A related issue here is exemplified in https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/importing-libphutil-repository-on-fresh-phabricator-triggers-an-error/2391/, which basically amounts to:
Dec 18 2018
Nov 15 2018
Aug 27 2018
This doesn't have a repro and will probably be fixed via rewrite / modernization in T13077 anyway.
Aug 25 2018
@bgamari Did you ever find a solution?
Aug 13 2018
Aug 11 2018
I did rebuild-identities on every instance
The "activity" migration went to production just now. I expect all production instances just bailed out, since I ran rebuild-identities some time ago, but I'll verify that:
Aug 9 2018
Jun 23 2018
In T12164#239595, @mydeveloperday wrote:just wanted to give you some reference data (your mileage may vary), I have 2 Phabricator instances with multiple git repos
one has ~300,000 commits ( a mixture of read-only (mirrors) and hosted repos), the other ~200,000 (all hosted)
in both cases I ran rebuild-identities after doing the Week25 upgrade
time ./bin/repository rebuild-identities --all
it took
21 minutes on the one with 300,000 commits and
16 minutes on the one with 200,000Can't help but think that this was most likely limited by the speed of the terminal output.
Hope that helps others
just wanted to give you some reference data (your mileage may vary), I have 2 Phabricator instances with multiple git repos
Jun 12 2018
I deployed D19484 and db010, db024 and db025 finished up with no issues.
These hosts ultimately timed out on the initial rebuild-identities: db010, db024, db025.
Jun 8 2018
From T13152 -- none of this is too important, just didn't want to lose it when I close that:
May 10 2018
May 5 2018
May 1 2018
Apr 30 2018
See PHI594, where a real user had the same human name as an external user from another project.
Apr 24 2018
@epriestley, can you confirm that the above patch should disable the draft state? I have applied it to GHC's Phabricator deployment yet we are still seeing Differentials opened in draft state.
Apr 12 2018
Yeah, this is a combination of a bulk editor bug (which lets you delete task titles) and legacy compatibility code for transaction title rendering (which treats null -> anything transactions as "created this thing.").
Apr 3 2018
Duplicate of T8936?
Mar 30 2018
When this eventually moves forward, it's probably also appropriate to remove the syntax-highlighter.engine config option. I think this has essentially zero use in the wild and we have better modern patterns to approach the problem (without extreme-niche config options) if there are real-world use cases.
GHC recently upgraded its Phabricator installation and has been rather unpleasantly affected by this feature. We have multi-hour CI jobs, which often queue to a day or so of builds. Making contributors wait this long before receiving feedback is turning out to be rather problematic.
Feb 14 2018
Feb 12 2018
Feb 8 2018
See T13069 for this and other similar use cases.
I'm going to roll this forward into T13069.
Jan 31 2018
T11934 is a possible way forward on this (and other niche things) without adding a lot of Javascript and UI complexity, by supporting it through !fixes.
Jan 27 2018
Jan 24 2018
Jan 19 2018
Jan 9 2018
Jan 5 2018
Jan 3 2018
Dec 18 2017
Dec 13 2017
We have an outstanding support issue (PHI204) about timeouts with large files.
No.
@epriestley Are there any more concrete plans for this "nonblocking" builds? That is something we would like to utilise for one of our projects. Actually quite important as waiting for builds there is slowing us down quite a bit now.
Per above, pushes to staging areas did not push LFS in the past. We should figure out what the state of the world is now and try to resolve it in the upstream, and document anything we can't work around or resolve.
@Grimeh, above, reports that this doesn't work over HTTP. I believe it does, but we should verify this.