This appears to be stable and working properly. D19897 removes a straggling guardrail.

Pushing the requireCapabilities() change out one more week since I had some stuff crop up early this week and it didn't get a chance to soak.

I'm going to push this out to next week since D19586 probably has a few minor issues with it and it's close to the release cut. It adds a lot of new policy checks which weren't explicit before, so I'd guess it may cause a few improper policy errors on things which are actually allowed. I caught a bunch of them (like "Mute Thread") but probably didn't get every single one.

T4675 survives this, because rendering policy controls on the client is very complicated.

I've marked D18863 as fixing this. This doesn't expose bulk editors in all applications, but generalizes all existing bulk edit operations and makes the process of adding more bulk editors straightforward.

I'm going to call this effectively resolved:

bin/audit delete --users employeewhonolongerlovesus

Yeah, you should be able to use diffusion.commit.search (with the authors constraint) + diffusion.commit.edit to accept/close the commits.

I would accept to have to issue some very long winded command on the console...

Thanks Evan,
while I perfectly understand your point in sharing that link with me that's not an applicable option: I am evaluating a code review solution and I initially fall in love with Phabricator, so much I've started a large scale PoC, which is where I currently am.
Sadly, either I failed to understand the real capabilities of this suite, or the suite is not fit for our needs. In any case, I don't have a budget for this PoC other than my team time, meaning I cannot take your suggestion into consideration and I also don't think it would be practical as part of a PoC.

See Consulting if you'd like immediate help with this issue.

I don't know if this is still being worked, but I find myself in a tough situation: I have a team member which has 1k+ audits, but he has recently resigned and I don't see an easy way to remove that person from each and every audit he has been assigned to!

Mine's fine here, too:

Only 5? I expected more.

I plan to look into this stuff after new home settles

Design atrocity incoming for T10747.

I'd be interested in the Refine the workboard/form interaction idea.

@epriestley Is there a pathway for reading (not writing) edges which would be open to community contribution? Having arc patch Tnnnn functionality, pulling all the revisions attached to a particular task, would be really attractive for us as we tend to have a larger number of revisions per task.

This is on EditEngine + Modular Transactions now. There are probably still some remaining issues I didn't catch.