Can you click that link, then "Enable Form"? Or do you get some kind of error?

Works perfectly. Thanks a lot!

I do now see that, but I'm unclear how to use its form to configure the form to configure the form to configure the form from.

A MARVEL OF ACADEMIC PURITY, EDITENGINE PUSHES THE BOUNDARIES OF ADVANCED FORM THEORY TO NEW DEPTHS

DO YOU HAVE ACCESS TO FORMS FOR CONFIGURING FORMS?!

How do we envision these rules applying to the following situation?

Yeah, there's no real hint about that in the UI to suggest that the box will update, and it's easy to miss since it looks nearly identical after it updates. I'll add a piece of hint text to hopefully make it more clear.

OH, that only happens if you do the human-readable option. I didn't notice that little box at the bottom had changed amidst the giant blob of json that the call returned.

Oh, maybe we could make this more clear. Here's how to use the examples to figure out how to make a call:

Thanks for you help and I'm sorry the steps I provided are not enough to reproduce my problem. I will gather more information and post soon.

The good news though is with that hint I seem to have it working without even needing to POST: https://phabricator.myurl.com/api/differential.querydiffs?api.token=api-TOKEN&ids[0]=5

I can definitely try either of those two options, but to my point, it wasn't obvious to me from the documentation:

(Kicking Documentation off because this would just be another tab next to PHP / cURL / arc in Conduit, not static documentation.)

Can you use a service like https://requestb.in with curl?

4f9bbb63ae9b was tested on this server. very scientific.

I am not able to reproduce the bug based on the steps you provided above. Do you have more steps or rules in place that I should be following?

Does your webserver error log have a more specific stack trace on the server? I can't reproduce this locally.

Yeah I can't seem to fix this ad hoc. My guess is it's never worked to allow you to skip the first tab. If I fix the error states, it then breaks existing tab panels. So we'd need to build a migration.

I just plan to fix the bug. That's the hard part of a 2-person team with thousands of open issues. Pick and choose the battles.

This feature might be the key to unlocking growth, but the design needs a little polish. Gently placing back in your queue for 2018.

I don't really see a pathway to turn this into a particularly useful and/or hilarious feature that has enough of a payoff to justify the legwork.

Thanks for the response. That's what I had concluded after trying to modify it, but wanted to make sure.

Actually, this is a little different from what I've been seeing locally. I'm just going to merge this into T11037, which discusses some general improvements to phd status output.

Thinking about this again, what about making this hard-coded numbered list instead a list of draggable items like it's used in Menu Configuration?

Based on like 10 seconds of looking at the code that's where I'd start. 💯

amazing what sleep will accomplish

I think i need to set the inputs with an actual key, not just [], so [$ii]

For me, I often need to click into the link to check if I am a reviewer or a subscriber. It would be nice if I could know who are the reviewers by looking at the email.

We should still be able to handle this case, but I can take a look at what's happening since this is a nonstandard element and the fix is probably easy once I understand what's going on with the logic.

See also T5853 (distinguish between "blocking" and "reviewing" in email) and T10574 (provide more guidance around the pathway toward a revision becoming accepted).

I want

Ordered a new batch of tshirts at great corporate expense.

@epriestley as far as I can tell, empty tokenizers do not POST an input to evaluate.

Our users are also missing this, since they can't tell whether they're a blocking/lone reviewer from the e-mail.

I can't think of any offhand. It might be easier to fix the dashboard/panel stuff first (i.e., inherit parent dashboard permissions) and then do this rather than the other way around, though.

@epriestley any reason to not implement Spaces on Dashboards?

👍🏼

We can also shrink/hide buckets from the panel context but keep them from the ApplicationSearch context. I think that's desirable -- if you go to /differential/ it's probably good to see all the bucket headers? Just not so good if you have a "Stuff to Review" panel on your home page.

I'm leaning here towards making empty buckets just disappear, and if all buckets are empty, No audits need your attention.

With subprojects, #project changed to mean "that project, and all its descendant projects", but any(...) and not(...) still mean "just the parameter, exactly". I think viewerprojects() and projects(user) are also "just the parameter".

Great! Thanks for the report, and for your help confirming the fix. Let us know if you run into anything else.

Checked out that commit and gave it a run. Profile images all generated without errors and I can now reach the front pages of Maniphest and People successfully.

Thanks! That's consistent with 32-bit and I suspect the & 0x7FFFFFFF part of rP9326b4d131ce will fix it.

In T12444#216565, @epriestley wrote:

@deathsyn Can you show me the output of this command on your system to help confirm that there's a 32-bit issue at play here?

$ php -r 'echo PHP_INT_MAX."\n";'

The other bugs I'm more certain are actual bugs, but I'm not totally sure about that one.

(Alternatively, upgrade to rP9326b4d131ce and run the bin/people ... command again and see if that just fixes it.)

@deathsyn Can you show me the output of this command on your system to help confirm that there's a 32-bit issue at play here?