Work which has been prioritized under Paid Prioritization.
Details
Mar 17 2021
Jun 9 2020
This approximately exists now via T11968.
Jun 5 2020
Jun 4 2020
May 1 2020
Thanks! I didn't know it could be done from the web UI.
Apr 30 2020
You can open the revision in the web UI and "Request Review". You can use arc diff --browse ... to open the web UI automatically.
We just found a real issue with this, different from what I mentioned above: We had an issue with our CI machine, and to fix it we needed to make a diff. But as the CI machine is not working, the diff won't build, which means we can't accept the diff that will solve the issue.
Is there a way to disable this option via a config in the server or a CLI parameter?
Feb 13 2020
Feb 12 2020
Nov 4 2019
Oct 25 2019
Jul 12 2019
Jun 28 2019
Any update on when this is going to reach stable? We're ~16 weeks past the earlier estimate...
May 17 2019
Apr 28 2019
The complexity of handling this makes adding a "the whole repository is caught up, deal with it" from T4453#13 sort of step more attractive. This would be far easier to motivate if we had more stuff that suffered from similar issues, though.
Apr 2 2019
Feb 28 2019
You will soon be able to give builds different "Hold Drafts" behaviors. See T13258.
Nov 21 2018
I do have a real-life example where the prose diff engine rendered a suboptimal diff. I was able to fix it by changing the maximum length of the edit distance matrix from 128 to 256.
Nov 15 2018
Oct 25 2018
A specific subcase here is when the binding to an Almanac host has been disabled. We should possibly test this during Interface construction, treat it as a failure, then recover from it.
Sep 24 2018
I think this has failed to collect any compelling use cases in several years and don't plan to pursue it.
Aug 25 2018
@bgamari Did you ever find a solution?
Jun 29 2018
Apr 24 2018
@epriestley, can you confirm that the above patch should disable the draft state? I have applied it to GHC's Phabricator deployment yet we are still seeing Differentials opened in draft state.
Apr 12 2018
Mar 30 2018
GHC recently upgraded its Phabricator installation and has been rather unpleasantly affected by this feature. We have multi-hour CI jobs, which often queue to a day or so of builds. Making contributors wait this long before receiving feedback is turning out to be rather problematic.
Feb 12 2018
See Planning.
Is there someone working on this feature?
Feb 8 2018
I'm going to roll this forward into T13069, which discusses remaining work for "mail stamps".
Feb 4 2018
Jan 27 2018
Jan 9 2018
Jan 5 2018
Jan 3 2018
Dec 13 2017
No.
@epriestley Are there any more concrete plans for this "nonblocking" builds? That is something we would like to utilise for one of our projects. Actually quite important as waiting for builds there is slowing us down quite a bit now.