T11050 seems to be describing a different issue. I don't mind having the review in my queue just not in the must review section.

Yeah sorry I was missin your step 2a from above. I guess this behavior just feels weird since it's saying specifically that I must review. As a user I intuitively think of must review as something that I have personally blocked. For user B to see must review makes sense. But I don't think the same applies to every other member of the project. It's ok for the review to remain in my queue under needs review. Just not all of a sudden upgraded to must review.

Revisions in the "Needs Revision" state (i.e., following the reject in step (2)) should never appear in "Must Review". I think the steps are missing a step "2a", where the author updates the revision with new changes?

Hey, one of our teams is experiencing this issue as well - many of their tasks include the name of a flag with a lot of punctuation, such as subgrowth_biz_buy_order_summary. At some point in the not-terribly-distant past, searching for these flags started to return 0 results.

Why is it important to see all the duplicates at a glance?

oh well

There's currently no way to query that, since the dashboardPHID is in a JSON blob in the PhabricatorProfileMenuItemConfiguration table.

One thing I'd like to bring back is "Install" in some fashion, which is easy to prompt and do the legwork on landing it on a home or project menu, but doesn't seem we can let you know where a dashboard is used and if you have it installed.

T12233 is an essentially identical case, although it discusses other analogous use cases (hide/shrink "Audits" if empty; hide/shrink "Reviews" if empty).

Also: I think it's reasonable that if no event has happened in some time (A week? A month?), the Taskmaster would take 15 seconds to react to come back when it's needed (i.e., allow auto-scale to 0 if last task was a long time ago, although I'm not familiar with how the overseer and daemon scaling actually works).

They support a set of 12 currently.

I just dropped her off at daycare but I will submit proof that she is alive and unharmed after I pick her up this evening.

send puppy pics please

See Planning for help on status and timelines.

From elsewhere, it would also be nice if this tokenizer highlighted instance members of instances associated with the billing account. There isn't a straightforward way to determine which "joe" or whatever is correct right now that works better than "ask Joe what his account name is".

Whats the status of this? Also is there any actual documentation for the existing @generated and differential-generated-paths functionality?

The most important aspect in flexibility is the ability to support all locales. MediaWiki uses a system largely based on PHP's date() for historical reasons, see Language::sprintfDate().

Sorry, I never tried to bother you.

In T12232#210902, @yelirekim wrote:

Yeah I clicked "Delete File" and can't see it anywhere now.

Yeah I clicked "Delete File" and can't see it anywhere now.

You destroyed the original file in Files too, right?

Edited to not give out my credit card number on the internet.

No problem, we're not in any rush.

(by the way @epriestley I haven't forgotten; some things have come up but I'll try to get back to you this weekend!)

Asking questions to the community first frees the developers up to fix bugs and make new features.

How do you suggest we handle reports/feature requests that have not been properly filed per our guidelines. Currently you've opened 4, and likely all 4 have not met our guidelines. Our guidelines are based on what it costs us (2 developers, unpaid) to give a basic level of free support to anyone. Without some base guideline, we become overwhelmed with support and are unable to move the project forward.

Humm I'm sorry but it's not a support question. I think It's a feature request o even a bug...

Great! Glad that worked out. I think the documentation is good enough given it's description. We'll keep an eye on it.

Thanks for testing @jcox!

verified

Thanks for the suggestion, we'll keep this task around if there is further interest we can always reopen.

This isn't a valid feature request. See Contributing Feature Requests and Describing Root Problems for what we take into the upstream. Specifically this needs a root problem described.

Unfortunately we don't take support questions as feature requests. See Support Resources for more information.

T12214 was the task.

I presume this was fixed on Monday with b33bb3714bdb, can you verify?

I've seen the same issue (on latest stable install).

Just to clarify, I tested it locally, not on this install.

Just to provide some more information, filling this feature request I realised that I like the fact that you have created two different forms (Bug and Feature Request) with the tags preassigned to avoid people "forgetting" to tag them.

Yes! It worked! Thanks!!!

:3

You should be able to implement canAddToObject() to do this. If you want a Home-only item, implement it like this:

It looks like that worked, thanks for the help!

I'm going to fix this Real Soon, I absolutely Definitely Promise 100% ™ ®. But I'll accept a patch from a reputable contributor like @jcox any day.

🍻

Can haz badge??? 🍺

USD beers are $3-4