Tried numerous ways to do so.
Always failed with it.

In T12447#216806, @epriestley wrote:

But if you say "Haskell" you may have to wait a minute.

I'm going to presume this is approximately resolved.

Raw HTTP is actually perfect for me! Thank you!

But if you say "Haskell" you may have to wait a minute.

Maybe easier would be for you to tell me what language you want to use and I'll just write you a snippet which encodes a request?

The page implies that all I should need to do is POST up, for example, the following:

To be clear though, I still haven't figured out how to actually put in a POST body. It's fine to use URL params for something like differential.querydiffs, but I can imagine the problems I'll run into with URL length when doing harbormaster.sendmessage (especially when reporting a bunch of unit test and linting results).

(In the longer term, the permissions here could probably be cleaned up, but I think that's the cleanest fix without upstream changes.)

You can edit the "Create Form" form and change "Visible To:" to "Members of Project: Doctorate in Form Theory". Then only members of that project will be able to create other forms or edit the form form, I believe.

Enabling that form seems to have done the trick -- thanks! Since it got renamed at some point from "Create form," its existence was almost certainly confusing to some previous admin, which is what got us into this.

Ah. I think you'd just see this, then:

FWIW, All packages in our monorepo have weak dominion.

Overall, you only get checkboxes for users, packages and projects which are already reviewers, with the exception that you'll get one for yourself if you aren't a reviewer yet.

I think there is also zero legitimate reason for the form-configuring-form to be editable and this entire workflow essentially represents a trap for the unwary.

If you can't enable that form, you might need to go hunt it down in the database and manually enable it (or tell me what you hit and we'll fix it if it's a bug).

Can you click that link, then "Enable Form"? Or do you get some kind of error?

Works perfectly. Thanks a lot!

I do now see that, but I'm unclear how to use its form to configure the form to configure the form to configure the form from.

A MARVEL OF ACADEMIC PURITY, EDITENGINE PUSHES THE BOUNDARIES OF ADVANCED FORM THEORY TO NEW DEPTHS

DO YOU HAVE ACCESS TO FORMS FOR CONFIGURING FORMS?!

How do we envision these rules applying to the following situation?

Yeah, there's no real hint about that in the UI to suggest that the box will update, and it's easy to miss since it looks nearly identical after it updates. I'll add a piece of hint text to hopefully make it more clear.

OH, that only happens if you do the human-readable option. I didn't notice that little box at the bottom had changed amidst the giant blob of json that the call returned.

Oh, maybe we could make this more clear. Here's how to use the examples to figure out how to make a call:

Thanks for you help and I'm sorry the steps I provided are not enough to reproduce my problem. I will gather more information and post soon.

The good news though is with that hint I seem to have it working without even needing to POST: https://phabricator.myurl.com/api/differential.querydiffs?api.token=api-TOKEN&ids[0]=5

I can definitely try either of those two options, but to my point, it wasn't obvious to me from the documentation:

(Kicking Documentation off because this would just be another tab next to PHP / cURL / arc in Conduit, not static documentation.)

Can you use a service like https://requestb.in with curl?

4f9bbb63ae9b was tested on this server. very scientific.

I am not able to reproduce the bug based on the steps you provided above. Do you have more steps or rules in place that I should be following?

Does your webserver error log have a more specific stack trace on the server? I can't reproduce this locally.

Yeah I can't seem to fix this ad hoc. My guess is it's never worked to allow you to skip the first tab. If I fix the error states, it then breaks existing tab panels. So we'd need to build a migration.

I just plan to fix the bug. That's the hard part of a 2-person team with thousands of open issues. Pick and choose the battles.

This feature might be the key to unlocking growth, but the design needs a little polish. Gently placing back in your queue for 2018.

I don't really see a pathway to turn this into a particularly useful and/or hilarious feature that has enough of a payoff to justify the legwork.

Thanks for the response. That's what I had concluded after trying to modify it, but wanted to make sure.

Actually, this is a little different from what I've been seeing locally. I'm just going to merge this into T11037, which discusses some general improvements to phd status output.

Thinking about this again, what about making this hard-coded numbered list instead a list of draggable items like it's used in Menu Configuration?

Based on like 10 seconds of looking at the code that's where I'd start. 💯

amazing what sleep will accomplish

I think i need to set the inputs with an actual key, not just [], so [$ii]

For me, I often need to click into the link to check if I am a reviewer or a subscriber. It would be nice if I could know who are the reviewers by looking at the email.

We should still be able to handle this case, but I can take a look at what's happening since this is a nonstandard element and the fix is probably easy once I understand what's going on with the logic.

See also T5853 (distinguish between "blocking" and "reviewing" in email) and T10574 (provide more guidance around the pathway toward a revision becoming accepted).

I want

Ordered a new batch of tshirts at great corporate expense.

@epriestley as far as I can tell, empty tokenizers do not POST an input to evaluate.

Our users are also missing this, since they can't tell whether they're a blocking/lone reviewer from the e-mail.

I can't think of any offhand. It might be easier to fix the dashboard/panel stuff first (i.e., inherit parent dashboard permissions) and then do this rather than the other way around, though.

@epriestley any reason to not implement Spaces on Dashboards?