Could you please reconsider this task considering what I said in the previous comment?

My /etc/sudoers file

I created a question at https://secure.phabricator.com/Q261 . @tycho.tatitscheff Thank you!

Here is my /etc/nginx/conf.d/default.conf file

My server system is CentOS and my webserver is nginx.

@tycho.tatitscheff Big Thankss!!

As in "Applications => Maniphest => Configure" - Configure option does not appear to be shown

In T10004#151960, @joshuaspence wrote:

OK, I managed to reproduce it on this install, see T10083. Specifically see T10083#151963 in which I attempted to close the task as resolved.

sdfgdsfgSdfadsgfsdfgsef

Three out of four's not bad.

Fourth time's a charm

Third time lucky?

Attempting to close the task again.

OK, I managed to reproduce it on this install, see T10083. Specifically see T10083#151963 in which I attempted to close the task as resolved.

Attempting to close this task.

This is another comment.

This is a comment.

Actually, I am seeing still seeing this issue on our install on tasks which aren't affected by any Herald rule (that I know of).

If you did like above, and that make it works, i will edit my answer to sum thjat up !

from Q179 :

Thanks for the help! I did read all those links, but I didn’t see the specific information I’m looking for — how to enable the build box to connect back to the hosted repo via SSH+git.

Thanks for the report! Let us know if you run into anything else.

@epriestley Thank you very much for this fix and the explanation!
It seems that this issue is now finally solved and can be closed.
Great start of a new year! ;)

We've seen exactly the same problem on one of our repositories.

In T10004#151717, @joshuaspence wrote:

Yeah, I can't reproduce it anymore either. I definitely saw it earlier today on a different install (which is up-to-date within a couple of hours) but I don't know what was special then.

@YouyiDev : as @epriestley says, maniphest is not longer a good way to ask for help, but you can use ponder for that.
It is a little bit like stack overflow so if your question is wide enough, you can have different answers (like one for one platform, one for another)
I already resolved something about git hosting via ssh in Q236 and Q237 !

See the documentation: sh -c `some subcommand`

Showing inline bash command snippets containing backticks seems like a pretty common usecase. The only workaround I found is to use the triple-backtick syntax but that takes up more space and breaks the flow of the text.

It's not a bug that you can write plans which deadlock.

I managed to temporarily workaround this issue by upping the limits on the blueprints, but obviously that is not ideal if the machines can't sustain that number of working copies in parallel.

I think it might be possible to cause a deadlock with limited leases even if the Expected Behaviour is achieved, approximately by devising a build plan like this:

This is expected. Please read Customizing Forms carefully.

This does not describe a bug in Phabricator. See Contributing Bug Reports for help on filing a valid bug report. See Support Resources for information on getting help with setup and configuration.

I've already did

This is my nginx.conf

This is my /etc/sudoers file.

I believe the behavior as described is (currently) expected with Mercurial. To update revision B without A's changes you must specify the commit from A to B, otherwise it will default to the range from master to B which will include A's changes.

I renamed the task to indicate specifically which linters are being asked for, so as not to just request generic "Java" ones. Initially this task was just for checkstyle, but after I got it working in D14632 I decided to give PMD a shot as well. In hindsight it probably would have been beneficial to keep them separate, though there is a dependency on some changes in order to get a java jar to run as a linter. Let me know if you prefer them to be separated to different revisions/tasks.

• Do T8996 first.
• Add an awarderPHID or similar to the new table and start storing who awarded the badge.
• Render it in the UI somewhere.
• That's good for unbeta, we can add commemorative notes and stuff later. I want to rework the award flow a bit sooner or later anyway.