I believe your analysis and proposed change are correct. D18177 brings that change upstream. It is now available in master, and should promote to stable later today (within about 12 hours).

This should now be fixed in HEAD of master and promote to stable later today (within about 12 hours). This change hasn't been deployed to secure.phabricator.com yet but will be deployed no later that tomorrow morning (about 24 hours from now), at which point the example link you provided should start working.

I think it's probably reasonable for us to warn about RSVP'ing to an event which has already ended. I'd guess this is usually a mistake, and in cases where it isn't some kind of weird off-label workflow is taking place and the warning is probably fine.

Firefox iOS seems fine

Testing upload from Android with Chrome:

I don't believe we've ever supported Firefox on mobile. Do you have the ability to use a different browser? Or are all browsers on Android non-operative here.

And here's the official AWS docs for connecting VPCs using OpenSWAN: https://aws.amazon.com/articles/5472675506466066

So it occurs to me that we could have one "shared" public subnet that contains: 1 shared Internet Gateway, 1 shared NAT Gateway, and then per-install VPN nodes. We should be able to setup routing tables for the private subnets that point to that install's VPN node. Since routing is enforced at the network layer (routing tables on actual EC2 nodes are bogus), that would enforce traffic separation. In theory, installs could saturate the IGW or NAT gateway, but I'm pretty sure those resources should autoscale since they're managed by EC2. A NAT gateway with no traffic going through it is $32/month, and as far as I can tell, an Internet Gateway is free, but eventually we'd be saving some money.

Another AWS gotcha learned the hard way: nodes in a "private" subnet can still be part of an "internet-facing" ELB, but the trick is that you have to attach the ELB to the "public" subnet that contains the IGW and the NAT Gateway, and the nodes in the "private" subnet need a route to the NAT Gateway.

Why do you want to track users with Google Analytics or a similar library?

@PhoneixS thank you for the fix. It fixed a very annoying problem here with Windows-1252 encoding in a file name!

Please don't test this server. We will disable your account.

Probably resolved.

in T6722#197239 I had the same problem with "land revision from Web UI" :)

Note that we can not send SSH traffic over an ALB -- they only speak HTTP/HTTPS. However, we can send it over v1.5 VPC ELB, apparently (v1 classic ELBs do not let you listen on 22).

On secure, I could only find a crontab for the ubuntu user, which is as follows:

0 6 * * * /core/bin/host backup
0 7 * * * /core/bin/host prune --force
0 8 * * * /core/conf/util/generate-documentation
0 9 * * * /core/conf/util/generate-symbols

Having played with a few more of these tools and thinking about the problem, I'm starting to lean towards "use Terraform or CloudFormation for orchestrating AWS infrastructure, and leave the provisioning stuff in rCORE as-is". The basic flow for provisioning private instances could be:

I too wish that there was some confirmation mode for arc land (and maybe arc diff too?).

The "consulting firms" use case is explicitly disavowed by, e.g., the Spaces documentation, here:

I can't think of any solution to this short of full policy + complex policy rules such as "users that share project/space/payment account/instance with this user", which is complex (and probably slow to compute, or requires lots of extra stuff to maintain).

See T9530.

As is sometimes the case with legal issues, I think this request is based on a misunderstanding of the law. The German "Telemedia Act" establishing this requirement ("Telemediengesetz") does not seem to require the link to appear on every page.

• Remarkup areas got inline previews in D14855.
• EditEngine got some extensions to restore similar on-page previews to Maniphest.

If we put spaces on user accounts, how do I get into a Space you have permission to see so you can add me as a Manager on the payment account for phacility.phacility.com in Phortune using the typeahead?

Thanks for this - suggested solution works perfectly!

Spaces for user accounts?

#dropbox has also encountered this since upgrading from MySQL 5.5 to MySQL 5.7, and thus an InnoDB FTS backend.

We use (most of) the graph code for drawing the "Task Graph" and the "Revision Graph" so we need to keep it around in the upstream anyway.

This is fundamentally unfixable

doh! nice. I obviously need more coffee.

("Graph" button in upper right.)

https://secure.phabricator.com/source/phabricator/history/master/

I know just maintaining the hooks is more work but certainly less than what's involved in maintaining the graph code.

I think that's what D18131 did -- or do you mean something else?

Maybe provide some extension hook-points in diffusion so that the community can maintain the commit graph visualization as an extension?

This is fundamentally unfixable:

I think we're more-or-less at the point where the existing Nuance code is about as internally modernized as it's going to get, so there isn't a great deal of remaining obvious technical debt to pay down.