Page MenuHomePhabricator

CodeMouse92 (Jason C. McDonald)
Occasional Phabricator contributor, MousePaw Games CEO/Lead Dev

Projects

User does not belong to any projects.

Today

  • Clear sailing ahead.

Tomorrow

  • Clear sailing ahead.

Saturday

  • Clear sailing ahead.

User Details

User Since
Dec 31 2014, 7:08 AM (206 w, 22 h)
Availability
Available

Off-road programmer, open-source advocate, speaker, writer, musician, reluctant IT; can build weird things in eight languages and counting.

Recent Activity

Jun 29 2017

CodeMouse92 created T12885: Warning For Past Events.
Jun 29 2017, 11:11 PM · Calendar, Feature Request

Apr 25 2017

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T12488: Old Calendar events didn't get a utcInstanceEpoch populated, causing fatals on export.

@epriestley, what's weird is, I still have this on my bug install, despite having the latest stable updates. I checked, and the migration definitely ran. Thoughts on how to debug this further?

Apr 25 2017, 8:11 PM · Calendar, Bug Report

Apr 21 2017

CodeMouse92 added a comment to rP5c1e4488deda: Remove all "Phabricator Bot" code.

Well, crap, we were actively relying on this. Even had a new Conpherence integration created.

Apr 21 2017, 7:53 PM

Mar 31 2017

CodeMouse92 created T12488: Old Calendar events didn't get a utcInstanceEpoch populated, causing fatals on export.
Mar 31 2017, 6:37 PM · Calendar, Bug Report

Mar 27 2017

CodeMouse92 renamed T9900: Figlet does not properly render apostrophes with some characters from Figlet does not properly render apostrophe's with some character's to Figlet does not properly render apostrophes with some characters.
Mar 27 2017, 4:39 PM · Contributor Onboarding, Remarkup

Mar 20 2017

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T12373: Support macros in Phame.

@epriestley, I tested out the scenario with the change applied.

Mar 20 2017, 5:14 PM · Macros, Phame, Bug Report

Mar 14 2017

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T12373: Support macros in Phame.

Ah! That fixed it, thanks @epriestley. I'll let you know once I test out that configuration.

Mar 14 2017, 6:49 PM · Macros, Phame, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T12373: Support macros in Phame.

@epriestley, I wouldn't mind testing that scenario out this weekend (I'll have to change a couple of domain name settings to create the scenario, but that's easily undone).

Mar 14 2017, 5:53 PM · Macros, Phame, Bug Report

Mar 9 2017

CodeMouse92 created T12373: Support macros in Phame.
Mar 9 2017, 2:39 AM · Macros, Phame, Bug Report

Mar 4 2017

CodeMouse92 accepted rPcb912d17352c: Convert DifferentialRevision view to new PHUIDiffTableOfContentsListView.
Mar 4 2017, 1:40 AM
CodeMouse92 accepted rP36a50ccbae1e: Provide a more modern way to load packages owning a set of files.
Mar 4 2017, 1:40 AM
CodeMouse92 accepted rPHUbe546154255c: Reorganize PhutilDaemon into Overseers, Pools and Daemons in libphutil.

Yep, D17429 fixes it! Awesome-sauce. That's exactly why I didn't file the bug report yet - I'm on stable, so I can be about a week behind.

Mar 4 2017, 1:39 AM
CodeMouse92 awarded D17429: Update `phd launch` a Like token.
Mar 4 2017, 1:37 AM
CodeMouse92 raised a concern with rPHUbe546154255c: Reorganize PhutilDaemon into Overseers, Pools and Daemons in libphutil.

Hey, the Chatbot is now refusing to start up since I pulled in the update with this commit. Here's the cursory stack trace:

Mar 4 2017, 12:40 AM

Feb 26 2017

CodeMouse92 awarded T10350: Scripts to migrate old "points" fields and move projects beneath other projects a Mountain of Wealth token.
Feb 26 2017, 1:49 AM · Projects (v3)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10350: Scripts to migrate old "points" fields and move projects beneath other projects.

Thanks @epriestley and @rfreebern - your scripts worked perfectly! Between them both (and tweaking that one "hasSubprojects" field in the database myself), I was able to move an entire project tree. Yay!

Feb 26 2017, 1:49 AM · Projects (v3)

Jan 27 2017

CodeMouse92 accepted rPbf10fbdf6f5e: (stable) Promote 2016 Week 15.

For what it's worth, I haven't seen the problem I described at all recently. It must have been resolved (or there was a ghost living in my server...which I'm starting to suspect.)

Jan 27 2017, 7:11 PM

Oct 19 2016

stevex awarded T8145: Support global/broadcast notifications a Love token.
Oct 19 2016, 12:26 PM · Notifications

Oct 11 2016

CodeMouse92 edited the content of Community Resources.
Oct 11 2016, 11:15 PM

Aug 4 2016

CodeMouse92 awarded T8145: Support global/broadcast notifications a Mountain of Wealth token.
Aug 4 2016, 6:17 PM · Notifications
CodeMouse92 created T11430: Add PyLint3 to Arcanist Linters.
Aug 4 2016, 6:17 PM · Lint, Arcanist, Feature Request

Aug 2 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

@michaeljs1990, is was actually not possible to install PHP5 on Ubuntu 16.04 through a safe means (an apt repository or similar) for some time.

Aug 2 2016, 5:01 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure

Aug 1 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

@PascalReintjens, correct, in the same way that it won't run under Ubuntu 16.04 (which also comes with PHP7 only).

Aug 1 2016, 11:46 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure

Jul 18 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10750: Cannot Edit Comment on Files.

Awesome, thanks @epriestley. The update cron script runs that bin/storage upgrade every time.

Jul 18 2016, 11:22 PM · Files, Bug Report

Jul 14 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T4788: Allow "Edit Dependencies" both ways (blocking and depending).

I definitely agree that in most cases, 100+ subtasks (especially direct subtasks) is better as a project. Still, I think it would be pretty simple to just shut off the task graph (but not the list?) in those situations if there is an exception that hasn't been thought of.

Jul 14 2016, 6:36 PM · Prioritized, FreeBSD, User Delight, Wikimedia, Maniphest

Jul 11 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T4788: Allow "Edit Dependencies" both ways (blocking and depending).

@epriestley, just thought you'd like to know that, on that aforementioned massive task, the task names are now entirely missing. If you scroll all the way to the right, it shows the assigned person, and that's it. :\

Jul 11 2016, 9:24 PM · Prioritized, FreeBSD, User Delight, Wikimedia, Maniphest

Jul 7 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T4788: Allow "Edit Dependencies" both ways (blocking and depending).

@epriestley, I'm not expecting any particular solution, just as long as the list of subtasks is navigable in some sane fashion.

Jul 7 2016, 6:03 PM · Prioritized, FreeBSD, User Delight, Wikimedia, Maniphest

Jul 6 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T4788: Allow "Edit Dependencies" both ways (blocking and depending).

@epriestley, the use case is actually from my content development department. It's hard to explain the task, but the hundreds of direct subtasks was unavoidable, and the project workboard did not work well in their workflow. Developing content for educational software can be extremely demanding. That said, I'll admit it isn't common to have hundreds of subtasks. Still, it is a scenario that can happen, so the UI should still look good given that edge-case.

Jul 6 2016, 11:57 PM · Prioritized, FreeBSD, User Delight, Wikimedia, Maniphest
CodeMouse92 created T11283: Make Task Graph Collapsable.
Jul 6 2016, 6:06 PM · Maniphest, Bug Report

May 24 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

Confirmed workaround: set base project edit permissions to something other than Project Members.

May 24 2016, 3:16 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10661: Can't create milestone.

@sascha-egerer that would seem to be the main factor, and the reason this couldn't be duplicated initially. It isn't all milestones - it is specifically milestones for projects that have subprojects.

May 24 2016, 3:11 PM · Projects (v3), Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10661: Can't create milestone.

I know this was linked against my question, but I wanted to check and see if it is the same thing...

May 24 2016, 12:19 AM · Projects (v3), Bug Report

Apr 19 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

@epriestley, ah! I get where you're going now, though I'm not sure why I missed it before. *Sips more coffee.* Sorry.

Apr 19 2016, 4:13 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

Apparent temporary workaround if anyone hits this because they upgraded to Ubuntu 16.04. Not yet tested (since I'm still on 15.10 right now), but I have confirmed that the package repository in question is live and contains the proper packages.

Apr 19 2016, 4:06 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

@epriestley, oh, *THAT*. When people are running Linux servers, Ubuntu actually is one of the leading distros because of the ease of setup and use. According to w3techs, nearly 32% of all Linux servers are running Ubuntu. It's second only to Debian.

Apr 19 2016, 3:59 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9640: Make Phabricator compatible with PHP7.

@epriestley, he's right, see the official Ubuntu 16.04 release notes. More info here and here.

Apr 19 2016, 3:45 PM · Prioritized, Restricted Project, Infrastructure

Apr 14 2016

CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 14 2016, 9:05 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

@chad, I've updated the title to reflect the updated (and confirmed) duplication instructions. The specific problem is that, if a project has subprojects, then any milestones belonging to the base project cannot be modified.

Apr 14 2016, 9:05 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 renamed T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects from Cannot Manage Milestones to Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 14 2016, 9:04 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report

Apr 12 2016

CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 12 2016, 11:01 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 12 2016, 11:00 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

BINGO! We have duplication. The updated steps in the description *will* recreate the issue.

Apr 12 2016, 11:00 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

@eadler, how do I do that? EDIT: Nevermind.

Apr 12 2016, 10:51 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

@chad, I updated the reproduction instructions. I think the project having Subprojects already before adding the Milestone might be the mitigating factor. Let me know whether that reproduces. If not, I'll dig some more until we get this thing reproducing. I swear it's there!

Apr 12 2016, 10:50 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 12 2016, 10:50 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report

Apr 11 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

Is is a mitigating factor that the PawLIB [Project] has six Subprojects? They all work correctly. I didn't think of it at the time, but maybe that has the project membership subtleties mixed up.

Apr 11 2016, 10:20 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F1214869: phabbug2_11apr16.png.
Apr 11 2016, 10:16 PM
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F1214863: phabbug_11apr16.png.
Apr 11 2016, 10:14 PM
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.

Oh criminey, that should have duplicated. Those are nearly exact same steps I followed on my local copy, but I get this:

Apr 11 2016, 10:13 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 created T10779: Cannot manage base project milestones if base project has subprojects.
Apr 11 2016, 9:54 PM · Restricted Project, Projects, Bug Report

Apr 10 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to rP5ddaf5289862: (stable) Set time and date on Calendar Date Control form.

A multitude of thanks for this!

Apr 10 2016, 12:52 AM
CodeMouse92 awarded rP5ddaf5289862: (stable) Set time and date on Calendar Date Control form a Like token.
Apr 10 2016, 12:52 AM

Apr 9 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to rP2bdf8ae5a234: Set time and date on Calendar Date Control form.

I'm on stable, so this hasn't hit mine yet. Is there a particular way to patch this in without switching branches, or can it be promoted to stable (thereby stabilizing stable?) Sorry to be a hassle. It's one of those days. >.>

Apr 9 2016, 7:05 PM
CodeMouse92 awarded D15666: Set time and date on Calendar Date Control form a Like token.
Apr 9 2016, 6:54 PM
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10760: Calendar - Unhandled Exception.

(I got an error when I created this bug report, which is why I went and added another one. Then, I discover they're BOTH in existence. Meh. Merged duplicate into T10766: Calendar - Unhandled Exception, since I referenced that task elsewhere.)

Apr 9 2016, 6:51 PM · Calendar, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 merged T10760: Calendar - Unhandled Exception into T10766: Calendar - Unhandled Exception.
Apr 9 2016, 6:50 PM · Calendar, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 merged task T10760: Calendar - Unhandled Exception into T10766: Calendar - Unhandled Exception.
Apr 9 2016, 6:50 PM · Calendar, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to rPbf10fbdf6f5e: (stable) Promote 2016 Week 15.

Hi @chad, okay...that's creepy. I had the error on this server when I tried to submit the bug report a little bit ago. Now submitting an identical report, it's gone.

Apr 9 2016, 6:47 PM
CodeMouse92 created T10766: Calendar - Unhandled Exception.
Apr 9 2016, 6:45 PM · Calendar, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 raised a concern with rPbf10fbdf6f5e: (stable) Promote 2016 Week 15.

This is the last update to hit my server, and now both here and there...

Apr 9 2016, 6:29 PM
CodeMouse92 created T10760: Calendar - Unhandled Exception.
Apr 9 2016, 6:22 PM · Calendar, Bug Report

Apr 8 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to F516556: Screenshot from 2015-06-19 14:04:38.png.

Also, to directly answer your question, the existence of Schrodinbugs and Heisenbugs suggest otherwise. ^,^

Apr 8 2016, 6:19 PM
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F516556: Screenshot from 2015-06-19 14:04:38.png.
Apr 8 2016, 6:17 PM
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F649136: wiggio-3.png.
Apr 8 2016, 6:17 PM
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F649129: wiggio-2.png.
Apr 8 2016, 6:17 PM
CodeMouse92 changed the visibility for F649128: wiggio-1.png.
Apr 8 2016, 6:17 PM
CodeMouse92 added a comment to F516556: Screenshot from 2015-06-19 14:04:38.png.

Hi Chad, I had to try commenting on a file to test if a bug on my server was present here as well. It is - see T10750: Cannot Edit Comment on Files.

Apr 8 2016, 6:16 PM
CodeMouse92 created T10750: Cannot Edit Comment on Files.
Apr 8 2016, 6:15 PM · Files, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to F516556: Screenshot from 2015-06-19 14:04:38.png.

(This is a test, to validate a bug.)

Apr 8 2016, 6:09 PM

Mar 4 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.

Ah, I see. Well, that's one more way to solve it, I suppose. At the same time, it might be slightly less efficient if you have to do that on 20-30 objects in one session, and then edit. The hammer method would be one command and one login, and then you can edit all of the above (including policy, via normal web interface means.)

Mar 4 2016, 10:25 PM · Feature Request
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.

Hm, somehow I missed the documentation on that. However, set-policy does not work on all objects.

Mar 4 2016, 10:24 PM · Feature Request
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.

Added several scenario issues to the description. I don't know that I can track down all the comments, as this place is huge and my memory is pretty shaky on things like that. I just remember a observing few different conversations regarding it, but I cannot remember where. If we polled users, we could probably get a better idea of whether this matters to users in general.

Mar 4 2016, 9:26 PM · Feature Request
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.
Mar 4 2016, 9:23 PM · Feature Request

Mar 3 2016

CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.
Mar 3 2016, 10:52 PM · Feature Request
CodeMouse92 created T10513: Proposed Solution to Admin Control Paradox.
Mar 3 2016, 10:50 PM · Feature Request

Feb 2 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9348: No way to kick users out of a Conpherence.

Right, yeah. CSI is somewhat separate, since most of it isn't intended to be picked up by autodoc tools, but it is also designed to not conflict with those. (I should have the published standard up on my site in the next week.) Docs are "what does the code do" and "how do I use it", CSI is "why is the code like this and what is it doing?"

Feb 2 2016, 7:36 PM · Conpherence (v4)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9348: No way to kick users out of a Conpherence.

I'll admit, his docs are quite impressive. What I'm referring to is effectively inline-documentation of the code's intent itself, which is inherently separate from docs, and is solely to make maintenance by any programmer who takes the code on possible, without involving the previous dev in person, and largely without invoking the consequences of Brooks' Law.

Feb 2 2016, 7:33 PM · Conpherence (v4)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9348: No way to kick users out of a Conpherence.

I'd have to agree not to write things twice. That said, I do know that when we undertook starting our own animation system, we first dismantled the open source one we were considering prior (that's where we commented everything), and figured out the inherent problems at its core, which in turn prevented making the same mistakes in our system. Plus, some approaches may be at least partially salvageable for v2, tying back in with the basic idea of "don't code things twice".

Feb 2 2016, 7:30 PM · Conpherence (v4)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T9348: No way to kick users out of a Conpherence.

Right about now, it might be worth mentioning that my company instituted a standard of commenting every single logical statement in code, stating the intent of the logical statement (not just restating the code).

Feb 2 2016, 7:10 PM · Conpherence (v4)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T8972: Editing a room edits the previously selected one.

Yes, I know. I also know bugs can get buried or resolve themselves over time (seen both), so since this is a bit old, I'm just confirming on stable for reference. Take your time. :)

Feb 2 2016, 4:49 PM · Conpherence (v4)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T8972: Editing a room edits the previously selected one.

Confirming that this bug is still kicking in the latest stable.

Feb 2 2016, 4:42 PM · Conpherence (v4)

Jan 25 2016

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.

Just a heads up, this looks to be resolved. I've changed all the projects to only have future-valid hashtags, which usually involves my renaming the project to remove the [ ], and then, renaming it back, thereby forcing the automatic hashtag to regenerate properly.

Jan 25 2016, 10:36 PM · Projects, Bug Report

Jan 18 2016

CodeMouse92 updated subscribers of T9296: Default "one hour jump" logic not formatted correctly.

I can confirm this as well. (I also tried to find where this was to fix it...couldn't locate it. @epriestley, if you point me to the file this bug would be coming from, I'd love to tackle this.)

Jan 18 2016, 7:10 PM · Calendar
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.

Ah, I just edited because I realized the difference b/w hashtag and title. I don't like punctuation in hashtags anyway, so all's well. :)

Jan 18 2016, 6:58 PM · Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.

I don't mind DCing use of [] in the title, if that's what you were saying we should do...forgive me if I misunderstood. If so, I need something to use as a replacement. We have projects that are Teams, Projects, Departments, and Groups, all which need to be easily queried, and all of which need to be obvious where they belong. Right now, I'm saying "IMF [Team]", "PawLIB [Project]", and so forth. Just saying "IMF Team" or "PawLIB Project" looks entirely too messy and disorganized for our use.

Jan 18 2016, 6:52 PM · Projects, Bug Report

Jan 16 2016

CodeMouse92 updated subscribers of T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.

Just a heads up. I hope those duplication instructions are sufficient - this is a very weird one.

Jan 16 2016, 10:39 PM · Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 updated subscribers of Q282: Project Contains 'Objects That Don't Exist'.
Jan 16 2016, 10:37 PM · People, Projects, Arcanist
CodeMouse92 added a comment to Q282: Project Contains 'Objects That Don't Exist'.

After extensive testing, with help from @avivey on IRC, we discovered this actually wasn't caused by a deleted user - that had cleaned up just fine. It appears to be a new Projects related bug. See T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.

Jan 16 2016, 10:37 PM · People, Projects, Arcanist
CodeMouse92 closed Q282: Project Contains 'Objects That Don't Exist' as invalid.
Jan 16 2016, 10:36 PM · People, Projects, Arcanist
CodeMouse92 created T10168: Provide a clearer pathway forward for old projects with invalid hashtags.
Jan 16 2016, 10:36 PM · Projects, Bug Report
CodeMouse92 updated Q282: Project Contains 'Objects That Don't Exist' from to Project Contains 'Objects That Don't Exist'.
Jan 16 2016, 8:58 PM · People, Projects, Arcanist

Jan 9 2016

CodeMouse92 awarded T9348: No way to kick users out of a Conpherence a Like token.
Jan 9 2016, 1:27 AM · Conpherence (v4)

Dec 30 2015

CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.

Hm, I attempted another reproduction of the issue on a clean repo, and I can't get it to happen now either. Perhaps something didn't get the memo when I untracked some old binaries in the other repos. GA and mark this as invalid, I suppose, and I'll update here if I pinpoint a problem. Thanks anyway. :\

Dec 30 2015, 10:38 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.
Dec 30 2015, 10:32 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.
Dec 30 2015, 10:32 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.

Aih, I'm having one of those days.

Dec 30 2015, 10:27 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.
Dec 30 2015, 10:27 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 added a comment to T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.

Hmm, okay, I wrote those out in list form to make it a bit more obvious. I don't have any way to try and duplicate that here.

Dec 30 2015, 10:25 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 updated the task description for T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.
Dec 30 2015, 10:24 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)
CodeMouse92 created T10072: Arcanist Ignoring .gitignore.
Dec 30 2015, 9:37 PM · Bug Report (Needs Information)