I've just removed mentions from Consulting, but that should eventually be updated when this is formally available.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 5 2017
May 4 2017
test 2
For mention purposes, see also T12618.
Sounds good, let us know if you run into issues.
From blame, it looks like D15278 originally stuffed these and some other things into a bit of a weird place -- I think we had some other problems with too much stuff in dropdowns at the time, and that was sort of a "shove this stuff under a rug for now" change? But I don't really remember.
T.T
You should be able to use the "reviewers" attachment to get reviewer information. Here's an example of a query which asks for this attachment, and a response which includes it:
Just some notes for myself:
May 3 2017
Probably just a flavor of T7332? I think the non-realtime counts (e.g., after page load) have been accurate for me.
Yes, see maniphest.points in Config.
Yes, this will be implemented.
Also, just so I don't completely forget about it:
Changes in D17802, D17803, D17816 and D17817 all seem generally fine to me from cursory inspection. If D17819 seems sane for fixing the "huge blobs of unstable JSON" problem, let's stick them all on that, I'll take a closer look at the nodes, and we can get everything in? Good luck racing each other on minor version numbers.
Yeah, that directly helps with this. I think I have a pretty good plan for the actual mail part that isn't too crazy complicated, but the cutover/migration bit will be much simpler/smoother if we get things swapped over -- at least, most of the way -- ahead of this.
May 2 2017
I'm thinking about resolving this by having three states instead:
I think this was fixed by T12659 -- yell if you're still seeing issues?
This is also extremely silly, but I sometimes do it because I'm dumb and have muscle-memory for ⌘+1+⇥+⌘+V+⏎: searching for an object URL doesn't jump you to that object URL, but you probably meant to put it in the other box.