Is the outcome of this task likely to be select a source for a given project where source might be manual, or ldap, or something custom?
Would it be possible for the source to not only serve as an adapter but also create/remove projects on-demand?
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Mar 5 2016
Mar 4 2016
Mar 3 2016
https://www.w3.org/TR/capability-urls/ is relevant - Good Practices for Capability URLs.
Mar 1 2016
For magical historical reasons we actually serve an invalid cert within our production network. That is, if you visit the site in a browser on the corporate (or outside) world it works perfectly. Within production the cert has the wrong domain. This means that even adding the CA won't help since the peer name is still verified.
Feb 29 2016
Yes. Forgot about that.
Feb 28 2016
Feb 26 2016
Feb 24 2016
Feb 23 2016
In T10368#161308, @epriestley wrote:The other part of the root problem is: why do you have 10K refs? Can you just archive 9,800 of them to avoid this problem, particularly if you only care about master?
We don't rely on regex() for import only on the repository in question. We do use it for other repos, but we aren't concerned about them due to their relatively small size.
In T10368#161308, @epriestley wrote:If there's no technical reason git has to be slow, we may just be able to fix git.
ah, I misunderstood @epriestley's comments above.
From the create-a-macro page. Uploading from the home page just creates a file (which would be helpful if this task were complete :-p)
also, on Firefox, on our instance, I can't seem to upload a file by drag&dropping it. I can't test on this instance due to policy.
In general I find drag and drop workflows to be slow and annoying (with rare exceptions, such as workboards). In addition my browser is full screen so the actual workflow involves opening Downloads, finding the file among the hundreds of files, and reuploading it.
Feb 22 2016
I promise I searched first! Thanks for the info
To be clear: I was trying to describe my problem, not ask for a specific solution. EditEngine for creation would help a lot but I was focused on editing. I guess T10337 would actually solve the issue, though not in the web UI.
We have 2 distinct profiles and a few one-offs.
Ideally the following would be managed: Policies, Text Encoding, Branches, Actions. The remainder are templatized but obviously differ from repo to repo.