This probably already works, on the backend, but needs:

Let me know if there is a conversion diff I can follow.

We have this as a global setting per user, and a local setting per user per room. I don't know where it should live longterm. @epriestley ?

>.<
Should Herald be setup to supply this configurability, per channel?

Slack let's you ping the entire channel with protected usernames @everyone and @here, the latter which alerts everyone as if they were mentioned.

This is roughly reproducible to me now, since I'm redesigning the entire app (though the UI is mostly the same). I think we need to trigger a JX.Scrollbar update somehow, since the size of the message area changes but JX.Scrollbar doesn't seem to know until I widen or shrink the page. May need the wise sage @epriestley

It was also happening on my home windows 10, but I don't know the exact version there.

I think my local VM is just Windows 8

I'll fire up my new Win10 Anniversary computer here in a bit.

(Using what's currently deployed on secure.)

Chrome, IE11 on Windows 10:
Toggling the widget page doesn't resize the main dialog pane: It remains either too small (Leaving a space for the pane) or too big (Hiding some text behind the pane).

https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/P/browse/master/src/applications/project/lipsum/PhabricatorProjectNameContextFreeGrammar.php

i like my generator

https://github.com/aceakash/project-name-generator

What we have currently seems fine.

Maybe also consider some sort of unique room name?

You can still create limitless rooms with titles with 1 other participant. I just want a means of messaging one person in a persistent place without a room title. It's definitely a bit cumbersome to just send 1 person a quick note.

(We don't need to require a room name, and I think that's only a skin-deep UI requirement and not actually enforced lower down in the code.)

I'm with @epriestley on this - on our install I too have multiple discussions with same individuals, discussing different topics :) It keeps things clear.

At least personally, I don't think this is weird -- I think of it like sending email.

In T9348#156836, @joshuaspence wrote:

In T9348#156791, @exp10r3r wrote:

I tried doing an arc diff to submit my patch but ran into this,

[2016-02-02 21:15:55] EXCEPTION: (PhutilTypeExtraParametersException) Got unexpected parameters: standard at [<phutil>/src/parser/PhutilTypeSpec.php:150]
arcanist(), phabricator(head=master, ref.master=3264d9f680cb), phutil()
  #0 PhutilTypeSpec::checkMap(array, array) called at [<arcanist>/src/lint/engine/ArcanistConfigurationDrivenLintEngine.php:90]
  #1 ArcanistConfigurationDrivenLintEngine::buildLinters() called at [<arcanist>/src/workflow/ArcanistLintersWorkflow.php:44]
  #2 ArcanistLintersWorkflow::run() called at [<arcanist>/scripts/arcanist.php:382]

I could run through it by removing the following section in .arclint file,

,
    "xhpast": {
      "type": "xhpast",
      "include": "(\\.php$)"
    }

But it wouldn't let me commit.

Update Arcanist

At least so far, this doesn't seem like an acute problem. I'm going to close it until we have specific feedback.