I can't remember which ticket, but I remember a similar discussion regarding arc patch (whether arc patch should patch onto HEAD or pull from the staging area).
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 30 2015
Oct 29 2015
Oct 28 2015
Because this works from the staging repository, it will be possible to trick it right? I mean, I could do this to sneakily commit virus.exe to the repository:
Oct 27 2015
For now, I just asked him to change the policy to a custom policy consisting of users X, Y, Z.
In T9648#142020, @epriestley wrote:Can you see the repository? (PHID-REPO-rgnn364lembo2emt5622)?
mysql> SELECT * FROM phabricator_differential.edge WHERE src IN ('PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y', 'PHID-DIFF-czvpmjpj23wtl2th2h6a');
+--------------------------------+------+--------------------------------+-------------+-----+--------+
| src | type | dst | dateCreated | seq | dataID |
+--------------------------------+------+--------------------------------+-------------+-----+--------+
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 12 | PHID-TASK-shfyd2sba6htlrzybqp5 | 1445973949 | 0 | NULL |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 21 | PHID-USER-abzwhc667osh5mwd4gk7 | 1445981511 | 2 | NULL |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 21 | PHID-USER-inwz7rtaiuxgmjduhmmq | 1445981511 | 1 | NULL |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 21 | PHID-USER-mw6ockgrrgytq3d3yywa | 1445981511 | 0 | NULL |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 35 | PHID-USER-abzwhc667osh5mwd4gk7 | 1445973949 | 2 | 104425 |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 35 | PHID-USER-inwz7rtaiuxgmjduhmmq | 1445973949 | 1 | 104424 |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 35 | PHID-USER-mw6ockgrrgytq3d3yywa | 1445973949 | 0 | 104423 |
| PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 51 | PHID-TASK-shfyd2sba6htlrzybqp5 | 1445974513 | 0 | NULL |
+--------------------------------+------+--------------------------------+-------------+-----+--------+mysql> SELECT id, phid, status, authorPHID, lastReviewerPHID, dateCreated, dateModified, attached, viewPolicy, editPolicy, repositoryPHID FROM phabricator_differential.differential_revision WHERE id = 27030; +-------+--------------------------------+--------+--------------------------------+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | id | phid | status | authorPHID | lastReviewerPHID | dateCreated | dateModified | attached | viewPolicy | editPolicy | repositoryPHID | +-------+--------------------------------+--------+--------------------------------+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | 27030 | PHID-DREV-bdeb6h6c4yj32nqfnz7y | 0 | PHID-USER-hfenohlvucsbthy2su73 | NULL | 1445973949 | 1445982060 | [] | obj.subscriptions.subscribers | obj.subscriptions.subscribers | PHID-REPO-rgnn364lembo2emt5622 | +-------+--------------------------------+--------+--------------------------------+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------+-------------------------------+-------------------------------+--------------------------------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
OK, I have asked the author to add me as a subscriber... but I still can't load the page.
I received an email regarding the revision:
Is there any real news to extract translations from externals/?
Ah OK... I can't rememberif I had set a height when I observed this behavior.
I'm fairly sure that I've observed that behavior in Chrome.
Yeah, I'm on Android 6 and it seems to happen consistently. Yes, as far as I know Chrome on Android hands off downloads to the "Downloads" application. Steps to reproduce are basically:
I think we should disable the "Land Revision" action item if the revision has already been landed.
Interesting read regarding GitHib's usage of Git LFS: https://medium.com/@megastep/github-s-large-file-storage-is-no-panacea-for-open-source-quite-the-opposite-12c0e16a9a91#.310ve89hz
Oct 26 2015
Oct 25 2015
Oct 23 2015
Oct 22 2015
Ah
Oct 20 2015
For what it's worth, I don't use phabricator-ssh-hook.sh at all, I find it to be much simpler. Instead o use the following SSH configuration (which also allows me to run both administrative and VCS SSH over pirt 22):
Oct 18 2015
Yeah, T4026 seems like a reasonable path forward here in that there would exist a relation for "commit X addressed concerns raised in commit Y".
Oct 17 2015
Oct 15 2015
In T4721#53743, @epriestley wrote:And we should possibly consider splitting the permissions more granularly:
- View
- Show Secret
- Edit
So it's fine to reuse a key across multiple hosts which are registering as the same Almanac device, but I shouldn't reuse that key for different Almanac devices?
Quotes also don't work in Ponder.
Oh... so a single instance can register as more than one Almanac device?
I guess that my question here is two-fold:
Sorry, I don't quite follow...