Oh, maybe not. Things are kind of weird on secure. We should probably sort that out and get that hitting "real" /status/ somehow.

Oh, hrrm. Maybe that RedirectMatch is actually getting hit in practice by the LB, that's suuuper old. I get this from the host itself:

The actual check is elsewhere in that file:

secure is hitting the magic override code in the second link since we deploy rSERVICES there too.

Yeah, I don't like trying to mess with the LBs very much either. I recall the FB F5's (I think?) took like 75 seconds per API call and you needed to make 12 API calls to remove a host, I just figured AWS LBs might be some kind of special magic LBs that can add and remove elements from a list in about a second.

In T12607#220957, @epriestley wrote:

On health-check, vanilla Phabricator runs this:

https://secure.phabricator.com/source/phabricator/browse/master/src/applications/system/controller/PhabricatorStatusController.php

Another possible question here is: how long does it take to pull a node out of an ELB with the AWS API? If it's very fast, maybe worthwhile to pursue actively managing nodes in the LB. But I'm guessing it's at least similar to the ~10s health check stuff.

On health-check, vanilla Phabricator runs this:

I'm pretty sure there's a reasonable way to ask apache to gracefully stop in a blocking way

There's also a discussion to be had about generally increasing the robustness of the healthcheck: that endpoint could attempt a DB connection, look for a full disk, check that ntp status is reasonable, etc, etc. This has tradeoffs as far as creating extra CPU load, false negatives, etc, etc, but there's probably a happy medium between "Apache doing RedirectMatch 200 "^/status/$"" and generating a full page.

Maybe "duration of all file upload requests" / "duration of all requests". That isn't a perfect metric but should be a reasonable-ish proxy for real resources we care about, I think.

What would the appropriate query be? "Number of uploaded files with size greater than X as a percentage of all files/file bytes"?

nice progress bar

I suspect this isn't worth the complexity. If you drag-and-drop, the maximum request size is 4MB (one chunk) and we get a nice progress bar, resumable uploads, and the bucket can remain completely private. And we can do encryption and deduplicate file blocks.

I agree, pagination way below the fold is rather inconspicuous

hahaha, thanks... really easy to miss those

Bystander input: try page 3: https://phabricator.kde.org/source/krita/browse/master/libs/ui/?offset=200

I patched this and deployed it. I'll follow up on the internal report with details.

Thanks, this is fallout from an incident last night. The particulars involved instance and user details so the discussion was kept private. I'll fix this shortly.

In T12593#220668, @epriestley wrote:

I'm going to merge this into T12374.

If you have time, answering the questions in T12374#214870 on that task might be helpful. There are many possible implementations of this feature (e.g., per user/per workboard/global) and it's not clear to me which are desired from the use cases. It would also be helpful to understand what the major stumbling blocks are for using "bookmarks" and "saving queries to the menu" as workarounds (just cumbersome? Not the right scope/audience?).

I'd just redo them on a case by case basic. Too many variables.

In T12601#220840, @epriestley wrote:

The only behavior of --lintall is to make warnings act like errors. Just raise everything at error severity to achieve the same thing without patching anything.

The only behavior of --lintall is to make warnings act like errors. Just raise everything at error severity to achieve the same thing without patching anything.

In T12601#220824, @epriestley wrote:

You are probably raising messages at "warning" severity, but want to raise them at "error" severity. See, e.g., here for a description:

T4287#47494

You are probably raising messages at "warning" severity, but want to raise them at "error" severity. See, e.g., here for a description:

@chad, a lot of this is probably ultimately design -- how much passion do you feel for hovercards? The infrastructure is in good shape and I can add the "context hint" piece pretty easily if we want to look at that. Not sure if this is a bigger/more complicated project that you don't want to touch for the moment or whatever, though.

(I assumed it was a keydown vs keypress vs whatever event sort of thing but haven't actually looked into it.)

Yeah, this bites me half the time too.

One spanner in the works here is that not all applications with mail preferences are on Modular Transactions yet. I think these are missing:

(there are some other wierd issues in IE11, so I expect I'll clean up some of the UI issues I see).

We require reporters file complete steps to reproduce the issue. If we can't based on the information provided, it's still on you to provide an updated, more specific set of steps. Also, we don't support third party extenstions like sprint. Feel free to reproduce against a clean install on phacility.com

is there something I can do to help you? or some suggestions regarding the browser that better supports the tool?

We don't plan to implement this.

I can't reproduce this.

On the 26th we will update the version to the new one, I have been told.

Allowing users to select a subform from "Create Subtask" isn't technically very difficult, but it starts to potentially make the UI pretty messy and complicated. Some possible implementations are:

TEST:
Version Information

For my own reference, T12570 isn't exactly related but can probably be tested/fixed at the same time.

Stealing this since I think it's session/auth related, not profile picture related: I think the user has a legitimate picture, they just aren't allowed to download it since they have a partial session.

T8918 is related.

I'm going to merge this into T12374.

Please read and follow Contributing Bug Reports. Specifically this does not state which version of Phabricator you are running.

Is Arcanist saving information about files somewhere? or is it just a problem with the utf8 validator?

How can I change the subtype of an existing task? This only allows me to load tasks into a form specific to their existing subtype. (i.e. I have an animal, I want to edit it and change it into a plant.)

Thanks epriestley!

On meta

Corgi

Yeah, I was surprised neither of you jumped on "phounder". Where does that content live? I can't seem to find it in any of the repos I already have checked out.

(choose whatever you like)

I think we should all pick "Ph" titles.

Only if I get a cool title.

@amckinley Let me know if you need more to go on than the description above or get stuck anywhere.