Side question, so I can submit a patch, is it a libphutil way to :

if (workflow_os == "Windows") {
  exec(window_feature);
} else {
  exec(unix_feature);
};

I think you forget the root problem.

So mucher better, ty @chad.

It is a sort of quick sort for the new devs of a school project thus it is hard to split and do less subsubtitle but it is not that bad to put a sentence beetwen h3 and h4.
Thus you can close as won't fix (I cannot any more).

In T9942#147948, @chad wrote:

h3 + h4 is intended as header, subheader.

@chad, that seems to be rPbf227f77a5dc928f1380e4bc81059f83cfb96548 2 weesks ago and you explicitly add those lines so I guess it was intended for something somewhere.
Thus I wan't send a patchfor fixing this, cause I'm pretty sure to break somethink elsewhere.

Of course I would double check it this time, and really try the last diff send in the production environnement where i get the problem, to be sure it don't break the world like last time.

@epriestley, do you see it can be easy enough so I can to submit some patch ?

What was the push operation you tryed to do ? By default phabricator prevents dangerous changes (like history rewrite or other operations in which you have to use --force) but this can be disable in repository preferences..

I edited the answer to make it more clear.
If it works, you can upvote the answer and close the question as resolved.

You have to login using the one time loging token which you generate server side (command line) using /path/to/phabricator/bin/auth recover jpchristie.
Normally it pass all other auth. Then once loged in as administrator you can edit auth providers using auth administration.

Your welcome.

So please follow the guide from start again, then i or someone lese will helps debugging the "normal" stuff failing like permission in sudo, or git-executables not in path.

On http://phabricator.example.com/config/group/diffusion/ theire is all stuff you wanna configure ! In peculiar the ssh-port, the ssh-user ect.

Ah, oki. Was it not because comment are hidden field on new application form so if you can't edit the task, you can't edit the comment too.

because we have tooling which relies on the regular SSHD daemon being available on port 22. And thus, I have to add the remote like above.

@epriestley, not sure you are aware of this but the "create dropdown" (big "+" in navbar) still point manifest task to the default form.

Oo

• Fixing issue name

• Fixing stuff
• Fixing Lint and adding original version number

Not sure what happened.
It seems logical that it also matches the caps since the @i in the regex. So it must be something else.
I would see tomorrow. Maybe it was just Cahier_des_charges fonctionelles (somehere no underscore but an space). But in my shell, since all was underlined i'm not sure I would have distinguished it but I was pretty sure I have look there wasn't space instead of underscore.

I didn't indended to submit as it was.
The description I edited just after was not send through my mobile tethered connection. I just have sended it now !

Understood !

@chad i'm not asking for a full review nor for merging it soon (TM) !
I was just wondering what revision I had open and thus I was asking if it could be an working way to fix T9425 and T9436.
I fully understand if you have no time to look at it.

@epriestley, what do you think conceptually of this ?? If you have time giving me some thought ?

• Taking comment into account : not actually yet tested (i intend to switch python version and see all works as axpected)

In D14384#160642, @chad wrote:

javascript and regexes are my kryptonite

I will push my work later this week.

So i abandon it.

@epriestley i think I didn't delete index first.
Just bin/search index --all.

Next time, open a new ponder question (https://secure.phabricator.com/ponder/) per actual question you have, so it can serve for other people too. This task is mixing bug reports, general troubleshoting, cutsom homebrew troubleshoting and basic questions about how phabricator works. This thus makes hard for someone with same issue than you did to actually use the answser given in this task. That also makes core dev hard to close this task as resolved since there is a lot of different problem tackled.

I patched with D14370 and still get an issue. I can retry but I pretty sure I did think corectly.

Depending on what remote you have and what main branch you have.

Some people like @CodeMouse92 did raise concerns with first iteration of redesign.

@epriestley do you think it is worth trying to debug this ? those javelin components have alaways feel strange to me and for this one in peculiar, it really feels hard debugging it.

I also think left-aligned action is kinda weird (phriction does align it right).

Ty @avivey

Can you gives more info/context. It is hard help without.

Did you arc liberate ?? Running storage upgrade before arc liberating it produces :