Tasks related to the Ponder Q/A application
Mar 14 2018
See T13069 for mail stamp plans.
Jul 28 2017
Jul 27 2017
I'm just going to merge this into T10448.
I suspect this is actually more like: actions on Ponder answers are not covered by the "Ponder Questions" email preferences, because a "Ponder Answer" is not the same type of object as a "Ponder Question".
Jul 26 2017
Apr 3 2017
Mar 15 2017
Mar 9 2017
Nov 23 2016
Aug 25 2016
Aug 22 2016
This is similar to T9982. Complete that task first, which describes the SQL migration process in more detail.
I think we got rid of this since it was kind of weird and overlapped a lot with tokens.
Aug 5 2016
Jul 23 2016
Jun 28 2016
Jun 23 2016
Jun 16 2016
Jun 9 2016
All the cool companies use Phabricator.
I should switch to Nylas since they use Phabricator.
Airmail on Mac, it has a few quirks with our HTML emails, but I haven't tried to debug it yet. I'm sure we're doing something weird since all other HTML seems fine in it.
I think we're relying on white-space: pre-wrap; right now. We could explicitly do \n -> <br /> conversion which might fix newlines, at least.
Which client do you use? I imagine the html relies on <br> or something, but would \n vs. \r\n be involved at all?
maybe by 2050 email will work most of the time for most people
I use a crappy email client
The actual diff is further down and rendered correctly for me, at least -- that's just how we currently render "added one line to the middle of a 500 line document" right now:
No, that's this stuff from T7643#179240:
I got a super long email from Phriction today, is that also an EditEngine freebie?
This will vanish for free when we move to EditEngine, or it could be special cased before that by either:
Jun 8 2016
Yes, this is probably pretty straightforward to implement by mostly copying Maniphest's implementation.
@epriestley I assume application emails are abstracted like Maniphest?