KDE appears to be moving to GitLab (see: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/53206) and we haven't seen this request from other installs, so I'm just going to close this out.

D20420 accepts these refs. We don't show notes in the UI, but we have no outstanding customer requests for this.

See followup in T13105.

The apparent lack of support for scheduling in UTC in much more mature calendar software (Google Calendar / Calendar.app) further suggests that this is not an important feature for most users.

In T5698#223992, @chad wrote:

Oh hai Cura uses Phabricator? I have a Lulzbot at home!

Oh hai Cura uses Phabricator? I have a Lulzbot at home!

@Krinkle, @pablocarrillo I second your requests. Great suggestion. I have a large README.md that I would love to split into multiple documentation files, without losing all the formatting.

And hg export is mostly the same deal as git format-patch.

T12618 could be accomplished by parsing hg log --patch --rev <rev>, which is similar to git show.

KDE has some interest in this as our contributors are distributed around the world.

Recent security issues in GitHub, GitLab, etc., with markdown:

I'm going to probably re-design this page a little.

I think we could even default it to "fancy mode" without a setting, at least to start with. I'm not sure anyone will want to access the plain text mode with enough frequency that we need it to be sticky.

@epriestley this doesn't seem hard to build for a fledgling designer/intern engineer.

In T5029#210026, @bcooksley wrote:

@epriestley my apologies for this. I had sent out a memo previously asking for everyone to file tasks on our Phabricator so that I could co-ordinate things from there. It seems some folks have missed that, so i've now resent it to a wider audience.

(They could also go into the existing "Waiting on Review" bucket, but I dislike mixing authored and non-authored revisions in that bucket.)

The actual reproduction instructions are slightly more involved:

This is something I've wished for a few times. Along with just searching for repositories in general.

Sorry, yes I am bad cop sometimes. :(

@bcooksley, feel free to mention that you've talked with me about stuff when filing tasks in the future. Like 90% of what shows up here spontaneously is pretty questionable, so unannounced reports get fairly strict scrutiny.

Here's the downstream task: https://phabricator.kde.org/T5406

Note that I'm not asking for this to be done for everyone, by default. Rather, I want this to be an opt-in feature. I imagine this is also what the people who voted for the question on StackOverflow have in mind.

I was commenting on your suggestion to remove unwanted items from commit messages. It's a compliance feature for many businesses who need complete audit trails.

@chad sorry, but I don't follow, what has accountability to do with this?

@milianw Please keep in mind Phabricator is an enterprise tool, and the majority of installs (99%) are businesses who rely on the accountability we've built into the software.

See T10622.

Another reason for having a template: