The way I thought it was supposed to work is that instead of addresses like D832@company.com, we'd use phabricator+D832@company.com and thus only have to reserve the phabricator@ address. Is that not viable?

I intend to remove username@domain.com causing interactions with Conpherence.

(Allowing Phabricator to receive mail at domain.com and also having real mailing lists and users at that domain is still a bad idea, because the two namespaces will collide, but few normal addresses resemble Phabricator object addresses so the practical badness is low -- almost no one has D832@mycompany.com as a real address.)

Which feature do you mean to remove?

The second (or third or fourth or whatever, depending on how we're counting) Conpherence issue I'm unsure about.

Great, thanks. I've been putting off opening a task about the various errors we get when trying to comment on tasks by email when they involve aliases and replying all, but I will do it next time.

"Array to string conversion" is a bug. Once that's fixed (by D14996), the user will start getting some kind of error email instead (the bad conversion was occurring while trying to compose an email to notify the user about an error). That error email may describe an upstream bug, or may describe user error. The stack trace doesn't have enough information for me to guess.

In the sense that I'm doing something wrong, or that it's a real bug but probably easy to fix?

The first error is happening while we're trying to generate an error mail, so this maybe quite a deep rabbit hole, but that first surface error looks straightforward.

I (user B) also got this error message:

Sorry we don't have more ideas for you.

For posterity, opening the "Edit Blocking Tasks" link in a new tab did work, and that's good enough for me.

There's currently no way to create those relationships via the API (see T5873; see also T10034).

The server side of this is a fairly boring RHEL 7 setup. It's doing nothing other than running Phabricator, and so it has no other server side modules installed in Apache other than the minimums required to run Phabricator. My browser is also pretty boring; nothing extra added except for Postman. I've set up some creative and full featured web stacks in my day, and this isn't one of them.

Ok, thought I missed some magic strings or a trace posted elsewhere.

Oh, sorry, I was agreeing with you ("points to something environmental").

Oh, where does the trace say that?

Yes, the trace implies your entire environment is unsound. RocketLoader (T9716), mod_pagespeed (T4854) and other technologies which rewrite page content and Javascript can sometimes cause this, if you have any of that stuff enabled.

I don't know offhand what debugging information you can collect. No one else is reporting it and we can't reproduce it. This generally points to something environmental on your server (not Phabricator itself).

I don't know what about these tasks is unusual. The tasks I noticed this on were created two months ago and only today did I want to connect them together. From a user standpoint all I'm doing is opening the tasks and clicking on the edit blocking tasks link, and then I see only this in the javascript console:

I've also noticed this does not happen on every task (though it is certainly more than a few)

I can't reproduce this. Here's what I did:

(I never tried to reproduce with Command + Enter because I always use Tab, Enter, and the symptoms seem identical.)

Hmm, it is possible.

@joshuaspence, is it possible that this was causing the issue you were seeing in T10004?

Great, thanks much for the incredible responsiveness 😄

At HEAD:

Oh! Well that would make perfect sense, then. I'll update D14984 to just clear all the headers that remarkup can emit.

I think h2 is the largest remarkup header? I've never seen an h1 in use.

In T10110#152970, @chad wrote:

maybe just hr and h2

Oh, the comment was a screenshot. Inline + width should work on this host now.

D14983 fixes the interaction between inline and width. I'll push it to this server and wipe the cache now, and the comment above should start working.

Doing a bit more digging here... layout=inline doesn't work if coupled with size=xx.

@epriestley Are you sure inline works?

{F60 width=160, layout=inline}  {F60 width=160, layout=inline} {F60 width=160, layout=inline}

maybe just hr and h2

Can't you do this yourself?

See the Git documentation:

I do think we could reasonably put clear: both on hr and probably headers. I think it used to run into some problems with tables of contents, but we never (I think?) put them inline anymore (maybe in readmes in Diffusion?) so we should be in the clear, now.

Yeah. I think:

you're using layout=inline

Wait this works now. Huh?

Yep, table works, thanks for the idea!

My expectation would be this floats forever given current syntax. The only solution I can think of is a new Remarkup rule for clearing, which you can place anywhere down the line, which is what it sounds like you're suggesting.

Need a way to clear a float e.g. "clear:both"

Is there any markup command to "clear the float"?

Here's what I did locally. I wrote a rule to notify me about "dog" revisions:

Oh, I think this is because Differential doesn't fire Herald for comments.

Did your Herald rule actually fire? I don't see a step like "I looked at the Herald transcript for the revision and saw that it had fired, matched, and claimed to have forced delivery." in your narrative. That would be the simplest explanation.

Ah..!! OK I understand.
Sorry for struggle you.
And, Thank you : )

You've created a subproject or milestone. You're strongly discouraged from doing this, and this won't work for a while.

This is confusing, I assume you're changing the settings for "Ponder Questions". There isn't a set of mail preferences for "Ponder Answer".

Surely this should just never link to the object. That is, I would never expect it to be desirable that this text links to space S3.

This is not a valid bug report. See Support Resources and Contributing Bug Reports.

Oh my...
https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/configuring_outbound_email/ (https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/configuring_outbound_email/)

Then how can I reconfigure this outbound mail.

Properly configured outbound mail works. Your outbound mail desn't work (as you report), threfore, your outbound mail configuration is wrong - that's what I meant.

What do you mean with misconfig?

And so - You must've misconfigured outbound mail :)  or something like that :)

When I run the following command, I receive the email directly:

https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/configuring_outbound_email/#testing-and-debugging-ou

Where can find more information concerning the mail system.

This greatly depends on Your mail configuration. For example, our install has local mail server used for sending as well as some mailboxess i's sending to are local, giving near instantenous mail.

You can exclude various monograms from Remarkup in Config.