@epriestley :correct me if Im wrong, the way of fixing this is searching in the file that describe code block ?
Then i look for code in $this->getEngine()->isHTMLMailMode() blocks and try to get it right ? Seems easy for color, a little bit less for the gap.

In T9524#139448, @epriestley wrote:

Yeah. If we did the bar UI, I think the length of the bar is just "U + C" (divided by the longest bar shown on the page, I guess? Or like log-base-something of that so the absolute length of the bar always has about the same meaning?) with something like "C / (U + C)" percent of it colored in.

Or it could just say "2% of 23,000 Coverable Lines" but I suspect that would be harder to parse at a glance than a bar if you have a bunch of subdirectories.

Ok so I hava done what you advices me and im gonna submited this.
However to make it more clear, won't it be better to just add a new can_create policy.
I guess it should be able to say that admin are only willing "Moderator" members to create a new task but then the others users may comment it (I guess, you are probably gonna want that once Nuance is out).

Well a dark theme seems to require much more effort than this and be painless to support.
However I think after @epriestley works on high contrast theme, you can do the same as extension., if you want to code it.

Oki.

Oki this is much more clear so Worflow here is a javelin workflow.
Greping workflow in phabricator get me so much different workflow type that i was lost.

Is it possible to make 4 messages (not installed - old v1 - medium v2 - recent v2). Or this is too much complexity ?
Anyway, I will start this and then you put this on hold till Pygments release the new version, if you want ! Is it ok ?

I will purpose a diff too !

I found pha-get amazing thought.

So @chad are you oki for letting me contribute?

Woooh. That is fast, clear and precise. I will do it next week.

Is it something easy for external contributions? Can i try it?

Yes those build step. Is it ok for you if i try to diff for putting a modern grey/blue text, without those 3d-ish borders. Basically makes second screenshot match first one.

Oo
Already done in D14290

First thank you very much for writting this long explanation.

I'm aware this is a prototype so i don't expect support at all. However if the new workflow is quite what is expected to be done, is it that hard to give some hints ? Like what is done here !
Anyway I will try to find myself.

I include the fix for this in D14128

Related D14128

Anyway it is not for now !!

In T9431#137264, @epriestley wrote:

Some day you'll be able to spin up a container or host per build and tear it down afterward, but doing so creates a performance/efficiency tradeoff because you have to build and tear down more state per build. I suspect this tradeoff is undesirable for this project even if the code existed to make it (because host startup / teardown would likely overwhelm build cost).

I'm not quite sure if I should expect a response (here or on IRC) before submitting some code. Or if the maniphest task is sufficient.

My goal is to edit [[https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/P/browse/master/src/view/form/control/AphrontFormPolicyControl.php;23b2653f52cd16bc9cedfdf7328d401171e668ca$328-358 | AphrontFormPolicyControl::buildSpacesControl ]] to return null also when only default Space is remaining active.

Although builds will be isolated from services, they won't be isolated from one another. That is, anyone who can run a build can interfere with anything else happening on the same machine.

May I try to submit a fix ?

Oh ! Then let me correct the question.

@chad was more "desactivate space as an application". I can already "desactivate a special space" by archiving it.

I surely misunderstood the goal of this field/
For me it was more saying the details in detail and giving a summary in summary.

It is really a good pun
/me forking phab to add this

no you are perfectly right !
it is a ice compromise :)
closing this

My use case here is when you are developing on a public project (a phabricator public instance or a private phabricator that is mirrored into a public github api <- my case).

Maybe related : T8982

After a few try seems to works ..

Is it intented that I can upvote my one answer ? Im not even a ponder moderator !!

Im so sad this is closed ...

This task is over 9000

I added a diff that is way better than what is proposed in description.