User Details
- User Since
- Feb 9 2014, 1:22 PM (532 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
Feb 11 2018
@epriestley Ah okay sorry, I'll do that! But I think the first part is a bug.
My use case for a Webhook: Trigger a stage build when a commit is pushed to an untracked topic branch.
Feb 8 2018
@kislinsk Is it possible to externalize your solution? I have no information about the status of Phabricator supporting extensions but when there is a way to separate your solution from the core cleanly, why not creating a repository on GitHub? I would love to use this right now! :D
May 11 2017
Oct 29 2016
Jul 24 2016
I wasn't really sure. So I thought that "previous commit to build [...]" and "ancestors of that commit [...]" relates to the order in which Herald triggers, which must not be equal to the one in the repository. So Herald would trigger B-A-C and the build step Wait for Previous Commits to Build just ensures that they are processed sequentially. But regarding to your comment this was obviously a twisted thought of mine. :D
Thank you very much for your fast answer! What about the order? Does Herald/Harbormaster ensure in this case that the builds are always processed/triggered in the right order? I mean if there are three new commits A-B-C in branch develop pushed, is A build before B is build before C?
Jul 23 2016
Jul 16 2016
I feel very stupid! Sorry for bothering you guys. A thank you very much for your incredible quick help! I think this should be closed...
Uh wow! Let me try this!
Sorry for the confusion. I know projects and tags are the same. But we have to kinds of tags/projects: Projects and tags. And we need on the dashboard a list which shows only projects.
@epriestley No its about projects not tasks. I'll try to make the query you mentioned. Is there any possibility for custom query panels in the dashboard?
I know you guys don't like proposals for a solution so I put my two cents in a comment: The obvious approach for us would be a filter for the panel which supports custom fields. Or even better support custom fields in all query masks. Anyway thanks for this great product!
May 27 2016
Mar 31 2016
We are planing to use subprojects in two variants:
Another possible solution would be a query option for projects this you can control if you all projects (including subprojects) or just top level projects.
Mar 28 2016
@camilorojas You're welcome! PS: I like your avatar ... ^^
@camilorojas That's because you haven't defined the custom field std:maniphest:vendor:field. Checkout the docs to see how to do that!
Mar 26 2016
@camilorojas I think I just added the following file
Oct 29 2015
Sep 18 2015
@epriestley Thank you very much! Restarting php-fpm (sudo service php-fpm restart) fixed the issue. :)
Maybe I should check this without our patch. But the patch only regards some files in Phrequent.
Jul 13 2015
@Aronnax You're right I've forgot the adaptions in the listing:
.Jul 10 2015
@Aronnax @CodeMouse92 Here you go. Hope that's all ...
Jul 9 2015
@Aronnax @CodeMouse92 I'll try to upload the patch asap when I find some time. Currently I'm pretty bussy.
Jul 8 2015
Jun 26 2015
Jun 21 2015
May 20 2015
Wait this is even worse. I think I haven't published the add/edit feature ever separately. But this doesn't change my offer: sending you a patch and you could do the rest...
@CodeMouse92 The code is running in a production environment on the latest codebase. The problem is just this feature is bundled together with two other features in one branch and I really don't know how to select a lose set of commits using arc diff. I've tried once but I was only able to use the latest nth and that's not helping here. So this would mean I've to create a patch clone the repository download the older patch from the revision put them together and then I could use arc diff (but without the tests because I've no development environment). So when you could help here a little bit, I could send you the patches and you could do the rest (publishing them)?
Apr 8 2015
Mar 15 2015
What would be the best way to handle archived projects in this control?
Mar 6 2015
Hour user are unhappy with the emails because they can't see the related projects and have to click on the task link every time to get that information.
Feb 15 2015
I see no added value by bringing this into Fact or another reporting system beside the effort to implement this. Provide access to the collected data through common formats (XML, CSV etc.) instead would allow to use any tool to produces any specific report which is needed by the user (see T5151 and T5150).
Feb 14 2015
I'm just curious because of your comment, which was the reason for my last revision:
Hey @CodeMouse92, I've checked this and in fact you're not able to create/edit entries for other user through the UI; the first field is pre-filled (on create) and read-only (on edit and create):
@epriestley What can I do to speed things up here? I've added a revision like you mentioned in D10162. But I get no feedback. Please let me know how I can help.
The sad part here is, I already implemented this feature. It might have only one bug: You might be able to create or edit time entries for other users; I'm currently not really sure about it :). By eliminating this little bug the feature seems totally fine to me and brings a real effort because currently you can't create time entries which are already done (which happens sometimes in our company). And since you should only able to create/edit your own entries I don't see any need for a transaction history of these actions.
Well I'm a little bit confused about the last actions from chad. Because when you take a look at https://secure.phabricator.com/D10162#86393 you'll see that epriestley was willing to pull another feature in this context. So I tried to do that in https://secure.phabricator.com/D10674 but I got no reaction since that and thus unfortunately I don't see any effort in spending more time in this feature currently.
Jan 30 2015
Nov 20 2014
Search by IDs and Date Range: This is basically fine and can upstream immediately, but we should add (dateStarted) and (dateEnded) keys to the table. A couple of inlines. Separate this into a standalone diff and I can pull it after a couple tweaks.
Oct 10 2014
I had to create this stuff here on a local machine and had no time for a full installation of Phabricator. So I just cloned the repository and made the changes. But by using arc diff I got the following exception:
Oct 7 2014
Problem solved:
Oct 6 2014
Could anybody give me a short code-snippet which shows how to get the value of a custom-field of a task? So I'm able to implement my own export-format in the meanwhile.
Aug 21 2014
Thanks a lot for your help!
array(2) {
[0]=>
string(20) "git version 1.8.5.5
"
[1]=>
string(0) ""
}Is this a bug?
I've activated again and now it seems to be okay (Fully Imported).
The whole local directory of the repository was created by Phabricator. I just have used the UI. The shown git --version was from a terminal to the server.
Is it because develop is not the default on GitHub?
I also have edited the Default Branch to develop and the Track Only to master, develop before activating.
The repository exist, I've checked it manually with the same address, user and password.
Hm that's weird:
Ah sorry I forgot to mention:
Aug 12 2014
Search by IDs and Date Range
I'll add the keys and try to make an separate diff (see my question below).
Aug 8 2014
Aug 7 2014
Please let me know, if I can do anything to speed this up here (e.g. contribute tests), or if that feature is not desired at all.
@epriestley Thanks!
Aug 6 2014
I'm pretty sure this is caused by D9939. I guess it's PhrequentTimeSlices::getDuration().
Sorry!
I'm not really sure about PhrequentTimeSlices::getDuration() because I'm in a hurry.
Checkout the tracking on this task. I've tracked for this issue three times. Every time around a minute. But only the first two entries (2m instead of 3m) are displayed. Use the Prequent search and search for user witrin.
- Modernize global search typeahead datasource in Phrequent edit controller
- Corrects lint warnings