This isn't really the same as T7013 or T9161. T7013 was intended as a pure infrastructure optimization, I just named it really badly. And even if we had the fanciest rules imaginable, T9161 wouldn't help, because this case is currently unknowable.

Sorry, I picked a really bad name for it originally.

oh

This task has nothing to do with any user-visible behavior and is purely a performance/network optimization, despite all the discussion about batching emails here. :)

You can use the default syntax (+x +y) to perform an AND search explicitly. See:

We are using RDS for our Phabricator database and it is not possible to change the "ft_boolean_syntax" variable.

@chad : Thank you for your answer, that is very helpful. I will wait for custom forms on workboards.

(There is also a different type of cache from <object hash -> metadata> we could build in Git, but that's kind of a lot of work.)

In SVN, we can use a different icon because we have prebuilt cache of file types (and must have this cache for other reasons, and can build this cache efficiently, and SVN distinguishes between binary and text files).

Ok, thanks!

I would recommend creating a custom Maniphest form and requiring people who need to create tasks in those spaces, use those forms from the Quick Create menu. Custom forms are not currently available on Workboards, they will be at some point.

Please tell me if you would merge this improvement if we implement it.

In T9987#155481, @epriestley wrote:

We have not seen any evidence that installs which do not use git-phab experience this problem,

Quick update:

See also T7013, and maybe T9161.

Maybe I have not understand this and I could also not found any documentation for this topic.

It has been asked in Q287 too.

There is a similar discussion in T7676.

The same problem here. I have a lot of 'pending' audits because I did the commit and audited it. They have an accepted label in audit list, but 'partially audited' if I open the audit. It happens also if I'm the only member in the project that is needed to audit.

I had this same issue, I had to dig into the db to remove the duplicate phids

One issue which we'll hit eventually is that git-lfs doesn't currently support pushing to remotes by URL, but we push to staging areas by URL:

Is there any chance that this feature will be implemented sometime soon?

We recently switched from GitHub / HuBoard to Phabricator, and overall I'm really happy, but the one thing that I (and the other engineers on my team) sorely miss is the ability to change columns from within the task. It is really awkward to comment on the task but not be able to change columns without swiching back to the workboard.

Yes, the problem is also mentioned there, thank you. I wasn't able to find it somehow.

Right now, the main concern is trained employees moving cards on the workboard and accidentally changing priorities (due to sorting by priority), so I agree that improving the UI would be the higher priority. In the meantime, perhaps we'll patch our instance with https://secure.phabricator.com/T8135#130563 to prevent the surprise priority changes.

No way for the upload API to say "no thanks, I already have that file"?

Why are users who shouldn't be changing priorities doing it?

The concern that @magcius mentions is that we (Endless Computers) only want team leads to have permission to triage priority. We set that up by restricting who has access to forms that allow editing priority. But the priority-sorted workboard defeats that form-based protection. Is there some other way to configure who has the ability to triage priority?

See T10333 for plans to make dragging cards in sorted workboards more clear (and T8135 for additional discussion). Those UIs aren't as clear as they should be and we'd like them to be more clear.

We might still need this. We use priority aggressively for feature planning, and make sure only team leads can triage and adjust priorities.

Got you. Hope to perhaps see this feature implemented at some point in the future then, as it would be a big help to us on our client projects.

"project" there just the noun, not "Project-object", but we could probably pick a different word to avoid ambiguity.

Ah I see, apologies. As the Spaces user guide lists one of the possible use cases for Spaces as:

At the moment this is not implemented yet, so this is a feature request, not a bug report.

Quick progress update:

D15483 changes the constant to 47 (15 window size + 32 for gzip + zlib), which should accept and decode the broadest possible range of inputs. If this somehow breaks something, 31 (15 window size + 16 for gzip only) is probably the next thing to try. See that change for discussion.

This is probably a variant on T4551.

Not enough information here to give you an answer. Dashboard Panels are just embedded queries from other applications. So if it's blank on the Dashboard, it's also blank in Audit under the query with the same name, meaning there are no results.

For searching across all types of everything, I lean toward adding an "Insert object reference..." button to the header which pops up a search box (similar to the "Edit Blocking Tasks" box) instead of trying to trigger on {T... and such. I think this is a lot friendlier for new users, and we'll have a bit more room to let you filter/customize the query, and this operation is probably not so common that it needs to be triggered on a whim inline. For power users, we could maybe add a keystroke (say, Ctrl/Alt + @) or something so you didn't need to actually click the button.

In T4181#133830, @kaismh wrote:

I have created an upstart service for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. Create a file /etc/init/phd.conf and save the following:

(See also T2636 for previous discussion).

Pholio itself is getting fairly old, not sure when it'll get re-visited, maybe 6-12 months?

This is consistent with inline comments across all of Phabricator.