In T11291#185175, @epriestley wrote:It's possible that we're in the wrong by falling back to set character set utf8;.
For anyone who can reproduce this, does this fail?
mysql> set character set utf8mb4;
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Jan 6 2018
Jan 6 2018
Oct 14 2016
Oct 14 2016
Pawka awarded T10189: Differential email headers seem to be missing a Like token.
Jul 12 2016
Jul 12 2016
Jul 9 2016
Jul 9 2016
@eadler, I was just able to resolve this on our installation by installing the php56w-mysqlnd package instead of php56w-mysql, which is what we had installed before.
May 23 2016
May 23 2016
edibiase added a comment to T11017: Phabricator sending unexpected email for commits that aren't obviously related to the user.
That sounds like it might be what's going on. I apologize for not having better steps to reproduce; I'm working backward from example emails that folks are receiving, so it's been a bit of a guessing game as to how to make this happen.
Mar 7 2016
Mar 7 2016
Awesome; thank you!
Mar 3 2016
Mar 3 2016
Feb 19 2016
Feb 19 2016
edibiase updated the task description for T10393: Differential revision's images cannot be viewed as raw files.
Jan 22 2016
Jan 22 2016
Thanks, @epriestley (and sorry for getting back to you so late)! You're totally right that this is because I didn't actually update the revision.
Jan 20 2016
Jan 20 2016
Jan 9 2016
Jan 9 2016
Dec 9 2015
Dec 9 2015
Nov 10 2015
Nov 10 2015
Nov 9 2015
Nov 9 2015
Excellent; that's good to know. Thanks!
Are these updates legitimately accidental? Can you explain how users are accidentally making updates to others' revisions? I don't think we've seen this behavior on this install, or heard about it from other installs.
Nov 6 2015
Nov 6 2015
Thank you—that makes total sense. I'll track any feedback I hear from folks but will hold off on sending it your way until an appropriate feedback window opens up.
Nov 4 2015
Nov 4 2015
Nov 2 2015
Nov 2 2015
Cool; that makes total sense. Thanks again!
Thanks!
Thanks!
Thanks!
Oct 29 2015
Oct 29 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9661: arc land doesn't return to local tracking branch if it has a different name from the remote branch it's tracking.
This works great now; thank you very much!
Oct 28 2015
Oct 28 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9661: arc land doesn't return to local tracking branch if it has a different name from the remote branch it's tracking.
In T9661#142249, @epriestley wrote:oh come on you're just making up new workflows at this point
edibiase added a comment to T9660: arc land does not delete landed branch when landing directly to remote.
This is working great now; thanks so much for the fast turnaround!
edibiase added a comment to T9660: arc land does not delete landed branch when landing directly to remote.
That makes total sense—deleting master seems like a really bad idea in that case.
edibiase added a comment to T9658: arc land doesn't default --onto to a tracked branch if it is a remote.
Awesome; D14357 does seem to fix this. Thanks! (Also, the new help documentation for arc land looks great.)
Oct 25 2015
Oct 25 2015
Oct 23 2015
Oct 23 2015
Oct 14 2015
Oct 14 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9562: Show only the first N branches/tags on commits in Diffusion, with a "Show all..." link.
In T9562#140172, @epriestley wrote:I'd be inclined to show N branches, for some small value of N like 3 or 5 or 10, with a link to "Show 1,695 more branches which contain this commit...".
Preferentially choosing autoclose branches to order first in that N might be desirable, although picking the first N that the VCS gives us may be faster or more scalable (e.g., if you had 170,000 instead of 1,700, the cost to select the "good" ones might not be worth paying).
Oct 13 2015
Oct 13 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9562: Show only the first N branches/tags on commits in Diffusion, with a "Show all..." link.
A nice middle ground would be if I could specify to show some branches by default—for example, just autoclose branches—and to have others hidden unless specifically requested.
Oct 10 2015
Oct 10 2015
I think you're right; the best way forward for us to is to get more powerful filtering rules on the server side. In the meantime, your suggestion for using a mailing list or separate teams seems like a reasonable workaround. Thanks!
Oct 9 2015
Oct 9 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9543: In "arc land", recursively resolve tracking branches until we reach one in a remote.
(Cool—that seems very reasonable.)
edibiase added a comment to T9543: In "arc land", recursively resolve tracking branches until we reach one in a remote.
It seems perfectly reasonably to tackle the specialty-workflow problem via T5055, rather than blowing up the number of Arcanist flags. And, as you suggest, I think T9537 will largely eliminate my desire for this, since it will allow me to name my local feature branches whatever I want, and I'll only have to type the long remote branch name at feature branch creation time.
In T9537#139749, @epriestley wrote:My primary concern with implementing this as the default/only behavior is that we won't have anywhere to put the user when we're done that makes sense to an inexperienced / novice Git user.
Thanks, as always, for your prompt and thoughtful responses!
Oct 8 2015
Oct 8 2015
I think you can create a "Mailing List" user and add them to the project to accomplish this. This is in addition to other mail delivery.
Thanks! It looks like the message delivery was voided because of my preference not to receive mail from Differential:
Hrm; I added a Herald rule that would email me if I'm in the list of reviewers, and changed all of the Differential Revision notification preferences to "Notify", but I didn't get an email when I changed a revision where I was a direct reviewer. (I verified that the Herald rule matched the revision in question using the test console.)
Oct 3 2015
Oct 3 2015
edibiase renamed T9506: arc land's help text doesn't mention default of landing in tracked branch from arc land's help text for the "onto" branch is potentially confusing to arc land's help text doesn't mention default of landing in tracked branch.
Aug 26 2015
Aug 26 2015
edibiase added a comment to T9268: PREG_BACKTRACK_LIMIT_ERROR parsing commit under PhabricatorRepositoryCommitHeraldWorker/PhabricatorCustomFieldMonogramParser.
Thank you very much! I've updated to HEAD and everything seems to be running smoothly now.