If you have multiple bugs, please file them separately.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Feb 5 2015
I did not change the PHP Code Sniffer release, I applied the patch proposed. But this is not the only one issue mentionned.
Updating PHP Code Sniffer makes the error go away, correct?
Feb 4 2015
As far as i can see this can't work but is a bug in PHPCS. https://github.com/squizlabs/PHP_CodeSniffer/blob/master/CodeSniffer/CLI.php#L875
But i really don't understand why it works on your machine...
Feb 3 2015
Jan 31 2015
I think that this is already achievable with the ScriptAndRegexLinter. In addition, ArcanistXHPASTLinter also has this functionality (for PHP only). I feel that language specific linters would be better than just simply grep.
Jan 30 2015
Jan 29 2015
Yeah, in 5.6 this works.
richard @dev[~] -> php -v PHP 5.6.2-1 (cli) (built: Oct 17 2014 17:15:37) Copyright (c) 1997-2014 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.6.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2014 Zend Technologies with Zend OPcache v7.0.4-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2014, by Zend Technologies with Xdebug v2.2.5, Copyright (c) 2002-2014, by Derick Rethans
Jan 28 2015
Actually, this is perfectly fine in PHP 5.6 I believe.
Jan 26 2015
Jan 14 2015
Oh I didn't notice there's an existing ArcanistGoLintLinter. Thanks for pointing out. This is what I think missing:
- A linter that wraps go vet
- A linter that warps gofmt
- Add coverage support in ArcanistGoTestResultParser
What exactly are you looking for? There is an existing golang linter which wraps go lint.
Hi @chad, we're working on a a project using golang and phabricator. I can submit a diff to for those functionalities. Please let me know if it sounds good to you.
Jan 13 2015
Jan 12 2015
Jan 11 2015
Jan 9 2015
Jan 8 2015
Jan 6 2015
Jan 5 2015
Jan 4 2015
Closed by commit rARCb31e9c0cfee0.
Jan 3 2015
Jan 2 2015
Jan 1 2015
Dec 30 2014
Closed by commit rPHU9319f6d50d52.
+1
I'm inclined to maybe do away with it and just use new FutureIterator() explicitly everywhere? We don't really have that many callsites.
We should probably special case declare(), as declare(...); means something completely different from declare(...){}