contentID on Document should probably not be nullable. We can generate a Document PHID first, save the Content with the right Document PHID, then save the Document with the content ID. Deleted/moved/stub documents still have Content, I'm pretty sure -- oh, except we can't do, this because Content uses documentID, not documentPHID. So maybe kick the can down the road.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Sep 4 2018
Aug 31 2018
Aug 30 2018
Aug 29 2018
Aug 28 2018
The unit test results also don't currently show on individual builds, which is a little whack?
See T13189#240682 for some planning on the Unit Test result table.
Aug 27 2018
I kicked some user/profile/account stuff to T13190.
Aug 25 2018
I landed D19586 (the thing which breaks T13186) and pushed it here. This generally causes us to perform more policy checks, and may cause new policy exceptions which did not exist before (because the workflows relied implicitly on weak policy enforcement). If these crop up, the remedy is generally to explicitly weaken the required capability for the action.
I punted the rest of this to T13189.
Aug 24 2018
Aug 23 2018
Aug 22 2018
unless you believe this is just a different manifestation of the same underlying bug.
In T13187#240394, @epriestley wrote:See PHI757. Leaving inline comments on the right hand side of files not touched by diff B in an interdiff between A and B raises an error.
This is at least somewhat involved. Related behavior:
- In the standalone view, you can leave comments on either side -- and they swap sides!
- Deleting comments from either side raises a JS error ("TypeError: null is not an object (evaluating 'templates.r')"). (Actually, this looks like it applies to all standalone deletion?)
Aug 21 2018
Aug 20 2018
Aug 17 2018
See PHI757. Leaving inline comments on the right hand side of files not touched by diff B in an interdiff between A and B raises an error.