Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix an issue where some Differential edit pathways may not have reviewers attached
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Feb 7 2018, 5:42 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F18849158: D19022.diff
Thu, Oct 30, 8:07 AM
F18696684: D19022.diff
Sep 27 2025, 8:13 AM
F18695374: D19022.id45617.diff
Sep 27 2025, 5:26 AM
F18685313: D19022.diff
Sep 26 2025, 10:54 AM
F18657318: D19022.diff
Sep 23 2025, 1:18 AM
F18652058: D19022.id.diff
Sep 21 2025, 6:28 AM
F18642243: D19022.id45591.diff
Sep 18 2025, 11:10 PM
F18611344: D19022.id45591.diff
Sep 14 2025, 6:47 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Depends on D19021. Ref T13053. When you "Subscribe", or make some other types of edits, we don't necessarily have reviewer data, but may now need it to do the new recipient list logic.

I don't have a totally clean way to deal with this in the general case in mind, but just load it for now so that things don't fatal.

Test Plan

Subscribed to a revision with the "Subscribe" action.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable