After D12336:

In D10674#228773, @asherkin wrote:

In D10674#228771, @Ondrej wrote:

It's shame that such useful code is waiting years for review...

Per policy, Phrequent is a Prototype application and thus external contributions are not accepted for it.

In D10674#228771, @Ondrej wrote:

It's shame that such useful code is waiting years for review...

It's shame that such useful code is waiting years for review...

We haven't seen more interest in this in several years.

Thanks for link, i know that page already. This feature is the one missing for us to switch from another well-known system which have more and more performance and billing problems.
That means we can finish the development of this one : that's why i asked for a status, rather than a boring "will it be ready next week" :)

See Planning.

I just applied the patch (roughly) and the "edit" pen appeared in Phrequent. By the way, clicking on it lead to a 404 Not Found error page.

any news here? the implementation seemed on a good way but there was no update since July 2015

Adding a input box to the top so wherever you are you can just type in the task number you want to switch to, would be a plus.

No, it would not.

Thanks for the hint!

Go to Conduit on your install.

Phrequent is a prototype application, and we don't provide support for these types of apps. Mostly it's expected that they will be incomplete and once we do move them to being officially supported they will have these features naturally (for example Conduit is "free" for any modern application.)

Is documentation available through other means than Conduit itself?

Phrequent is not installed on this server. Conduit only shows methods from installed applications.

Hooray!

This was fixed in rPb28da10336ca 😄

Unfortunately, this is so far afield from our roadmap that we don't have room for this year, even under paid prioritization.

Related to paid prioritization, how much would it cost to terminate this task and also the ability to edit the time entries after validation (man does mistakes).

Just throwing in my support for this. I'd love to move away from paid services (aka Jira + Tempo) and use Phabricator.

Please see Planning for information on timelines.

It's been 2 years since this task was created ( my company isn't able to use Phabricator because this functionality is missing ). Do you have any update on current situation ?