User Details
- User Since
- Nov 22 2015, 7:03 PM (474 w, 3 d)
- Availability
- Available
Apr 24 2018
@epriestley, can you confirm that the above patch should disable the draft state? I have applied it to GHC's Phabricator deployment yet we are still seeing Differentials opened in draft state.
Mar 30 2018
GHC recently upgraded its Phabricator installation and has been rather unpleasantly affected by this feature. We have multi-hour CI jobs, which often queue to a day or so of builds. Making contributors wait this long before receiving feedback is turning out to be rather problematic.
Sep 29 2017
Oct 13 2016
I agree that there is no sensible technical reason for the broken network policies that prompted my comment and understand your reasons for preferring to punt on a technical solution. Thanks for your thoughtful remarks.
Some GHC contributors have had some trouble with the fact that there is no choice in staging area URL. Unfortunately, some users appear to be behind corporate firewalls which block anything but http and https. We use SSH for our staging repository, which is of course problematic for these contributors. There are a few comments above from Nov 2015 which suggest that we aren't the only ones who have this issue.
Aug 29 2016
GHC appears to be running into this limitation. We would prefer to use anonymous HTTP access with our build bots; is there any hope that this will be fixed in the near-term?
Aug 25 2016
GHC would also find support for importing keys from Github useful; we are currently working on rolling out a Diffusion-hosted staging area for use with Harbormaster but the need for contributors to submit their key to yet another Phab feels like unnecessary friction.
May 21 2016
You'll still need to go there and fill out all the stuff you would have filled out in your commit message. That is, this flow would drop you at the screen right after you copy/paste:
Nov 22 2015
Sounds good to me. Thanks again!
The documentation contains this paragraph,
Thanks for the review!
Done.
Fair enough. Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
@epriestley, the amended text should clarify my goals here.