Add more information to story POSTs during the feed.http-hooks hook
Open, NormalPublic

Description

When the feed.http-hook is fired, the HTTP script only gets barebones information. Would be nice to have a storyURI and objectURI (and whatever else is easily accessible and equally useful).

Sample POST is below:

Array
        (
            [storyID] => 719
            [storyType] => PhabricatorApplicationTransactionFeedStory
            [storyData] => Array
                (
                    [objectPHID] => PHID-DREV-3y5ngrx26wfopfrbkyew
                    [transactionPHIDs] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => PHID-XACT-DREV-brw7rovwpvcurdh
                            [1] => PHID-XACT-DREV-prmajp3rypmbtri
                        )

                )

            [storyAuthorPHID] => PHID-USER-s7hj4zduwubpc57fsce6
            [storyText] => user43215 created D109: - fixed some stuff.
            [epoch] => 1406561703
        )
andreas.lekas updated the task description. (Show Details)
andreas.lekas raised the priority of this task from to Needs Triage.
andreas.lekas added a project: Phabricator.

D10063 is likely a fix, but I need to test the POST part and that'll take more than 5 minutes to set up.

Support Impact This feature is fairly useless right now for all but the simplest things.

One concern about this is that this information is policy-bypassing.

Given that there are basically reasonable approaches for doing Conduit from an arbitrary HTTP-capable client now (T5955), adding more PHIDs/URIs is safe but we should probably remove all the text/markup from these requests. The expectation is that the endpoint receiving the POST will make a Conduit call to feed.query (or similar) in order to retrieve a rendering for the story, under some set of credentials which we can do policy checks for.

This would align this better with existing un-authenticated notification channels, like Aphlict, where you can know that something happened (and get some information about what object(s) it affected) but must be authenticated to learn any substantive details.

Although I don't think this is particularly important, landing some version of D10063 is probably worthwhile since people who try to use it often end up pretty blocked in reasonable use cases. It's only blocked by it being kind of a pain to set up and test.

epriestley triaged this task as Normal priority.Jan 5 2015, 11:49 PM

@epriestley: this task being fixed might be an easier solution than writing our own Doorkeeper integration (as discussed on Conpherence today). I already have an application that receives feed data via POST; can I help test this change so we can get it merged?

epriestley edited projects, added Feed; removed Support Impact.Apr 12 2017, 2:49 PM