I use flags with Herald to indicate "must look at this". Can I have an option to clear all flags when I accept a revision (and to make that stick even if the diff is subsequently updated) so that I don't have to manually clear flags all the time?
Description
Description
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T5529 Clear Flags on Accept | ||
| Resolved | chad | T5307 UX for taking actions with search results | ||
| Resolved | epriestley | T4100 Support query parameterization in typeaheads | ||
| Resolved | None | T4420 Modernize typeahead datasources | ||
| Restricted Maniphest Task | ||||
| Resolved | epriestley | T5750 Implement typeahead browse mode | ||
| Resolved | epriestley | T7688 Move token rendering into TypeaheadDatasource | ||
| Resolved | epriestley | T7689 Load handles just-in-time | ||
| Wontfix | epriestley | T7803 Implement a composite query which unifies cursor paging across subqueries |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
(Another useful feature would be the ability to exclude flagging revisions from a given set of authors.)
Comment Actions
For the latter case, can you just add [ Author ][ is not any of ][ alincoln, htaft ] to your Herald rule?
Comment Actions
A more general attack on this would be to give you a "Clear All These Flags..." action in Flags, and let you search for "Closed Objects". Then you could periodically run a query for "Closed; Differential Revisions; with Yellow Flag" (or whatever) and bulk clear them. You could adjust your normal query to show only Open objects so you could do this rarely. Would that be satisfactory?
Comment Actions
Yep, for the latter case you're right on, I missed it.
a "Clear All These Flags..." action...and let you search
Sure. Even simpler is checkboxes; it would be great to just run down the list and check those I want to clear.