Fix T11339.
Now, old and new are both simple lists of phids, and the rendering should make sense.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
epriestley - Group Reviewers
Blessed Reviewers - Maniphest Tasks
- T11339: Calendar: Inviting / uninviting transactions omit key information
- Commits
- rPb6bf0f6a3b49: Re-implement calendar.invite transactions
Viewed existing transaction with all 3 states.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rP Phabricator
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Maybe a better solution will be to make both values plain lists of invitees
Yeah, I think I like this approach better, as it's more symmetrical if nothing else.
resources/sql/autopatches/20160720.calendar.invitetxn.php | ||
---|---|---|
8 | "Restructring" missing a "u" I think? | |
26–27 | Prefer phutil_json_encode(), which throws if the value isn't encodable (e.g., invalid UTF8). | |
33–44 | Consider inlining this code: these functions will exist at global scope for all time, and collide with other functions named update_old_value() and update_new_value() in the future. IDEs may identify these as functions for autocomplete when there is a ~0% chance any user ever intends to type them, etc. |