In T1279#42118, @epriestley wrote:
- Ad-Hoc Blocking Reviewers: There's no way to add blocking reviewers from Differential or the CLI (T731). Despite some user interest, I still have a hard time understanding the need for voluntarily adding blocking reviewers.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Jan 15 2016
Jan 15 2016
• austinstoker added a comment to T1279: Show per-reviewer status in Differential revision reviewer list.
Nov 11 2015
Nov 11 2015
@epriestley I'll keep an eye on blueprints and the merge configurability. Thank you. Phabricator is awesome/and getting awesomer.
Nov 9 2015
Nov 9 2015
All the policy, merge strategy, etc., stuff is hard-coded to the easiest set of reasonable defaults. Some of these defaults may not be suitable for many installs (e.g., always rebase, always merge to master, require edit capability for imported repositories in order to perform merges). I expect to expand these shortly, I just don't want to focus on making things more flexible until they actually work.
Oct 24 2015
Oct 24 2015
Getting a ruleset for N of M reviewers would be enormously helpful, if while you are doing this you see a good way to add a time criteria that would help us out. Our current ruleset is roughly ( (90% of reviewers approve) AND (no one requested changes) ) OR ( (it has been 8 business hours) AND (at lease 2 reviewers approve) ) We anticipate in the future we may need to prove this rule is being followed so we are very interested in this feature.
Oct 17 2015
Oct 17 2015
• austinstoker awarded T182: Commit into repository directly from differential a Love token.
Aug 28 2015
Aug 28 2015
• austinstoker edited this Ponder Question.
• austinstoker awarded T731: Allow revisions to have alternate acceptance conditions a Like token.
Dec 18 2014
Dec 18 2014
We would really appreciate this!
Nov 13 2014
Nov 13 2014
• austinstoker added a comment to T5873: Update Conduit for ApplicationTransactions, CustomFields and Edges.
Thanks @qgil
Nov 13 2014, 1:38 PM · Haskell.org, Restricted Project, Restricted Project, ApplicationEditor, FreeBSD, Restricted Project, User Delight, Phacility, Custom Fields, Transactions, Conduit
Nov 10 2014
Nov 10 2014
• austinstoker added a comment to T5873: Update Conduit for ApplicationTransactions, CustomFields and Edges.
We want to migrate to phabricator from trac, but to get buy-in we need to migrate trac tickets and their custom fields to Maniphest tickets. As I understand we can either wait on this ticket, or delve into the code and try to resolve this. Is there any other option?
Nov 10 2014, 2:57 PM · Haskell.org, Restricted Project, Restricted Project, ApplicationEditor, FreeBSD, Restricted Project, User Delight, Phacility, Custom Fields, Transactions, Conduit
• austinstoker awarded T5873: Update Conduit for ApplicationTransactions, CustomFields and Edges a Like token.
Nov 10 2014, 2:50 PM · Haskell.org, Restricted Project, Restricted Project, ApplicationEditor, FreeBSD, Restricted Project, User Delight, Phacility, Custom Fields, Transactions, Conduit
Nov 4 2014
Nov 4 2014
• austinstoker added a comment to T5015: Allow Herald rules for Maniphest to act on task status changes.
We also want this!
• austinstoker added a comment to T4921: Detect when webserver configuration does not forward HTTP authorization.
Same problem here.
Oct 31 2014
Oct 31 2014
• austinstoker added a reviewer for D10764: Write bug report, feature request and code contribution guides: • austinstoker.