| nickz | |
| Feb 4 2015, 7:56 PM |
| F838318: Screen Shot 2015-09-27 at 1.23.31 PM.png | |
| Sep 27 2015, 8:24 PM |
| F838321: Screen Shot 2015-09-27 at 1.23.56 PM.png | |
| Sep 27 2015, 8:24 PM |
| F289460: pasted_file | |
| Feb 9 2015, 6:45 PM |
| F289445: pasted_file | |
| Feb 9 2015, 6:37 PM |
| F289441: Screen_Shot_2015-02-09_at_10.26.27_AM.png | |
| Feb 9 2015, 6:37 PM |
| F289443: pasted_file | |
| Feb 9 2015, 6:37 PM |
| F283031: pasted_file | |
| Feb 4 2015, 7:56 PM |
| F283027: pasted_file | |
| Feb 4 2015, 7:56 PM |
I set up a Herald Rule using the following conditions:
"sterling" is a project. But when I put "sterling" as a subscriber during arc diff and created the diff, the Herald Rule didn't get trigger due to the condition not matched:
I checked the review page which does show the "sterling" project included in subscribers:
Any ideas?
sterling matches a user in remarkup, while #sterling matches a project. Did you verify the sterling in the subscribers section clicks through to the project and not some user also named sterling? (Or said differently, did you type sterling as initially reported (not a bug and probably due to the issue I am describing) or #sterling (a bug)?)
@btrahan, I verified the "sterling" is a project, I clicked through it. Initially when I did the arc diff, I typed "#sterling".
Can you list the complete steps to reproduce?
Our guide for reporting bugs:
https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabcontrib/article/bug_reports/
Also of possible interest:
T4778: When will my feature get built, or my bug get fixed?
I built this here and was able to get a repro:
Specifically:
https://secure.phabricator.com/herald/transcript/69363/
Oops, there was an error in my rule (match all vs match any) so I reran it. Still looks like a bug:
Oddly, the dry run on D11721 works as expected, so something is getting lost coming up from arc.
This issue isn't triaged or assigned. See T4778 for how we prioritize our time.
Is this issue critical to your organization? That is, is your company at a standstill until this resolves or is work able to move forward around it?
Hi Chad, Yes, without this fixed, we are not able to move forward for all tasks which need putting a project to CCs as a condition of the Herald Rule. Yes, it's up to your guys' priority list. But I hope this can be address very soon. Thanks!
Is this the same as the herald based replacement for project mentions + email (T6819) ?
It would be great if we know the ETA for the fix no matter soon or not soon.
If you'd like solid ETAs, shoot us an email at contact@phacility.com and we can talk about setting up a service contract so you can pay us to prioritize your requests. Otherwise, see the task @chad linked (T4778) for a very detailed discussion of why we can't give you (or anyone else) an ETA (on anything).
