| avivey | |
| Sep 26 2014, 9:43 PM |
| F228062: Phabricator_DifferentialLostRepository.png | |
| Oct 31 2014, 12:44 PM |
A new revision was created via the web interface, and has a single transaction line shown, including setting repository, project and reviewers (by user).
Revision details have reviewers and project set correctly, but repository is not set.
A herald rule for "revision with no repo" was fired, and a rule for "revisions in that repo" didn't.
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resolved | btrahan | T6200 Inconsistency in revision history vs state | ||
| Resolved | btrahan | T6237 Use ApplicationTransactions properly in Diff creation |
I believe what's happening here is that the diff's setting for the field (which is empty) is overriding the revision's setting when the transactions are saved. Normally, when you update a revision, we copy the repositoryPHID from the diff to the revision.
In the case of web creation, we should skip this step, and/or move the "repository" field to the previous step (where you paste a diff in).
It fits - the diff was created by "by web" as well, and have null sourceControl* fields (I can't catch the developer to to ask questions).
Also if a new revision is created through the Web Interface and repository is specified, then it isn't saved. For example on http://qa.in-portal.org/D9 from action history you can see that repository was set on the form, but no repository appearing by the fact:
