Right now I'm not sure there's any distinction between audits triggered by global rules, and audits triggered by personal rules. That means if anyone sets up a personal Herald rule to trigger an audit, it will cause Diffusion to only show "Partially Audited" (if that person doesn't respond). This is the case on this Phabricator install, where every commit without a review is affected by a personal rule that someone has set up.

So before this is possible, I think there needs to be a distinction between audits triggered by personal rules and those triggered by global rules (in the same way that there's a distinction between manual buildables and automatic buildables in Harbormaster). That way the audit status of a commit can be determined by the global audits, and not be impacted by personal rules.

I think *this* Phabricator install has the most junk in it of any install on the planet. Easily top 10 if not #1... :D

In that sense, I don't think the average "personal" rule isn't important in the audit case. At least to me, when creating Herald rules the "personal" vs "global" distinction is such that I would make almost exclusively "personal" rules, even if I was the Czar or everything.

Maybe I don't get personal rules though, and how they differ from global.

We might already be doing this, but we could make the state viewer-dependent. Instead of "Audited" vs "Partially Audited" vs "Audit Required", we could show "Audited", "Audit Required by Others" and "Audit Required by You" (with shorter names, maybe). For your commits, this would need to be a bit different.

Or maybe we need two columns: one for state, and one for "do you need to do anything?". I think they serve slightly different use cases.