Page MenuHomePhabricator

Don't explicitly name abstract base classes
ClosedPublic

Authored by joshuaspence on Jul 20 2014, 10:40 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F15453948: D9989.diff
Sat, Mar 29, 3:16 PM
F15449795: D9989.id.diff
Fri, Mar 28, 12:20 PM
F15441384: D9989.id.diff
Wed, Mar 26, 5:54 PM
F15435731: D9989.diff
Tue, Mar 25, 9:59 AM
F15433430: D9989.id.diff
Mon, Mar 24, 11:07 PM
F15425695: D9989.id.diff
Sun, Mar 23, 5:31 AM
F15423437: D9989.id24028.diff
Sat, Mar 22, 3:26 PM
F15402303: D9989.id24007.diff
Mon, Mar 17, 9:51 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

Ref T5655. It is superfluous to include "base" in the name of an abstract base class. Furthermore, it is not done consistently within the code base.

Test Plan

Ran arc unit.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Branch
base
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
Tests Passed
Build Status
Buildable 1792
Build 1793: [Placeholder Plan] Wait for 30 Seconds

Event Timeline

joshuaspence retitled this revision from to Don't explicitly name abstract base classes.
joshuaspence updated this object.
joshuaspence edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
joshuaspence added a reviewer: epriestley.
epriestley edited edge metadata.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 21 2014, 1:26 PM
joshuaspence updated this revision to Diff 24028.

Closed by commit rP37106c1b3178 (authored by @joshuaspence).