Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix `packages(project)` to work properly and add it to "MailableFunctionDatasource"
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Oct 19 2018, 11:46 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 19 2026, 2:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 19 2026, 2:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 1 2026, 11:34 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Apr 1 2026, 11:34 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 7 2026, 8:39 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 6 2025, 10:15 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 5 2025, 1:08 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 1 2025, 1:44 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T13210. See PHI937. This function datasource isn't quite implemented correctly: it doesn't resolve package(project) properly, since the logic only handles users.

This blames back to D14013, where it looks like packages(..) was added mostly as a general nice-to-have as part of a larger modernization change.

Test Plan

Ran a packages(project) query in Differential, got accurate results (previously: no results).

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable