Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix `packages(project)` to work properly and add it to "MailableFunctionDatasource"
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Oct 19 2018, 11:46 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F18848013: D19747.id47176.diff
Thu, Oct 30, 3:05 AM
F18845724: D19747.diff
Wed, Oct 29, 2:10 PM
F18844930: D19747.id47176.diff
Wed, Oct 29, 8:23 AM
F18837064: D19747.diff
Mon, Oct 27, 4:15 AM
F18791515: D19747.id47178.diff
Thu, Oct 16, 2:17 PM
F18764001: D19747.id.diff
Tue, Oct 7, 3:35 AM
F18727029: D19747.diff
Sep 30 2025, 7:29 AM
F18700935: D19747.id.diff
Sep 27 2025, 4:17 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T13210. See PHI937. This function datasource isn't quite implemented correctly: it doesn't resolve package(project) properly, since the logic only handles users.

This blames back to D14013, where it looks like packages(..) was added mostly as a general nice-to-have as part of a larger modernization change.

Test Plan

Ran a packages(project) query in Differential, got accurate results (previously: no results).

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable