Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix `packages(project)` to work properly and add it to "MailableFunctionDatasource"
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Oct 19 2018, 11:46 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F19025088: D19747.id47178.diff
Mon, Nov 24, 5:29 AM
F18991554: D19747.diff
Tue, Nov 18, 10:32 PM
F18980253: D19747.diff
Sun, Nov 16, 11:41 PM
F18979597: D19747.diff
Sun, Nov 16, 10:24 PM
F18848013: D19747.id47176.diff
Thu, Oct 30, 3:05 AM
F18845724: D19747.diff
Wed, Oct 29, 2:10 PM
F18844930: D19747.id47176.diff
Wed, Oct 29, 8:23 AM
F18837064: D19747.diff
Oct 27 2025, 4:15 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T13210. See PHI937. This function datasource isn't quite implemented correctly: it doesn't resolve package(project) properly, since the logic only handles users.

This blames back to D14013, where it looks like packages(..) was added mostly as a general nice-to-have as part of a larger modernization change.

Test Plan

Ran a packages(project) query in Differential, got accurate results (previously: no results).

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable