Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix `packages(project)` to work properly and add it to "MailableFunctionDatasource"
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Oct 19 2018, 11:46 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F15369703: D19747.diff
Wed, Mar 12, 7:55 AM
F15367761: D19747.id47178.diff
Tue, Mar 11, 8:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 3, 7:51 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Feb 22, 8:03 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 11 2025, 10:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 11 2025, 10:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 9 2025, 6:36 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 9 2025, 6:36 AM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T13210. See PHI937. This function datasource isn't quite implemented correctly: it doesn't resolve package(project) properly, since the logic only handles users.

This blames back to D14013, where it looks like packages(..) was added mostly as a general nice-to-have as part of a larger modernization change.

Test Plan

Ran a packages(project) query in Differential, got accurate results (previously: no results).

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable