Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix module imports in Aphlict server
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Jan 18 2015, 11:19 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 22, 11:20 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 22, 8:41 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 18, 3:16 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 14, 7:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Nov 11, 8:46 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Nov 10, 2:46 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 5, 7:40 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 24 2024, 9:33 PM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

This was broken in D11383. Basically, I had the ws module installed globally whilst testing, but the changes made do not work if the ws module is installed locally (i.e. in the ./support/aphlict/server/node_modules directory). After poking around, it seems that this is due to the sandboxing that is done by JX.require.

A quick fix is to just not use JX.require, although you may have a better idea?

The error that is occurring is as follows:

<<< UNCAUGHT EXCEPTION! >>>

Error: Cannot find module 'ws'
    at Function.Module._resolveFilename (module.js:338:15)
    at Function.Module._load (module.js:280:25)
    at Module.require (module.js:364:17)
    at require (module.js:380:17)
    at extra.require (/usr/src/phabricator/webroot/rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init_node.js:48:16)
    at /usr/src/phabricator/support/aphlict/server/lib/AphlictClientServer.js:10:17
    at Script.(anonymous function) [as runInNewContext] (vm.js:41:22)
    at Object.JX.require (/usr/src/phabricator/webroot/rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init_node.js:58:6)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/usr/src/phabricator/support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js:102:4)
    at Module._compile (module.js:456:26)
>>> Server exited!
Test Plan

Now able to start the Aphlict server.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Branch
aphlict1
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 3909
Build 3922: [Placeholder Plan] Wait for 30 Seconds

Event Timeline

joshuaspence retitled this revision from to Fix module imports in Aphlict server.
joshuaspence updated this object.
joshuaspence edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
joshuaspence added a reviewer: epriestley.

Right, I see the issue now. Basically, we override the require function in the sandbox as follows:

sandbox.require = function(thing) {
  if (thing == 'javelin') {
    return require(dir + '/' + thing);
  } else {
    return require(thing);
  }
};

Where require refers to the require function from the init_node.js file. This maens that in order to properly import the ws module, the path needs to be specified relative to /weboot/rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init_node.js. Alternatively, an absolute path can be specified (i.e. require(__dirname + '/../node_modules/ws').

epriestley edited reviewers, added: joshuaspence; removed: epriestley.

Slightly cleaner fix, I think?

  • Use JX.require() only for Web-facing modules.
  • Use require() for Node-facing modules.
  • Use lots of relative paths, which are gross-ish, but probably cleaner on the balance.
    • I sure don't miss managing includes in libphutil environents.

To test this, I ran the server with a local ws, verified my browser connected to it, and then sent myself a test notification.

  • Very slightly cleaner fix.
joshuaspence edited edge metadata.

Two minor inlines, otherwise this looks good.

support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js
9

I think that by require-ing this here, we bypass the whole try { require('ws'); } stuff. Specifically, I would expect this to throw an unhelpful error message if the ws module is missing.

webroot/rsrc/externals/javelin/core/init_node.js
43

I think it's reasonable to still pass this in.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 19 2015, 7:41 PM
epriestley edited edge metadata.
  • Do library includes later to pick up 'ws' issue.
  • Continue providing a corrected __dirname in Javelin for consistency.
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.