Page MenuHomePhabricator

Improvements to `LINT_IMPLICIT_VISIBILITY`
ClosedPublic

Authored by joshuaspence on Jan 7 2015, 1:26 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F18445344: D11267.diff
Sun, Aug 31, 8:21 PM
F18278614: D11267.id.diff
Fri, Aug 22, 8:51 PM
F18278611: D11267.id27066.diff
Fri, Aug 22, 8:51 PM
F18278148: D11267.diff
Fri, Aug 22, 8:37 PM
F18113369: D11267.id27066.diff
Aug 13 2025, 1:43 AM
F18048291: D11267.diff
Aug 3 2025, 1:28 PM
F17630184: D11267.diff
Jul 10 2025, 10:25 AM
Unknown Object (File)
May 20 2025, 1:40 AM
Subscribers

Details

Diff Detail

Repository
rARC Arcanist
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

joshuaspence retitled this revision from to Improvements to `LINT_IMPLICIT_VISIBILITY`.
joshuaspence updated this object.
joshuaspence edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
richardvanvelzen edited edge metadata.

Seems reasonable to me.

One minor question - should it be:

  1. static public function or public static function
  2. abstract public function or public abstract function

?
For 1. I prefer the latter, while for 2. I prefer the former.

However, I don't care either way. This looks fine.

I think we use public static (vs static public) and abstract public (vs public abstract) nearly 100% of the time, although leaving the order undefined also seems fine to me.

epriestley edited edge metadata.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 7 2015, 2:20 PM

I actually have a lint rule coming up for LINT_MODIFIER_ORDERING.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.