Page MenuHomePhabricator

Add documentation for routing WebSockets through a reverse proxy
ClosedPublic

Authored by joshuaspence on Jan 9 2015, 12:24 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 8, 5:31 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 1, 8:19 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 20 2024, 10:41 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 20 2024, 12:22 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 17 2024, 9:11 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 6 2024, 5:19 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 5 2024, 6:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Aug 1 2024, 7:53 AM
Subscribers

Details

Summary

This is a little rough and should be considered an "advanced" option. Having said that, this works well in my install and I imagine that other installs will find this beneficial.

Test Plan

Eyeball it.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Branch
master
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 3706
Build 3717: [Placeholder Plan] Wait for 30 Seconds

Event Timeline

joshuaspence retitled this revision from to Add documentation for routing WebSockets through a reverse proxy.
joshuaspence updated this object.
joshuaspence edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)
joshuaspence added a reviewer: epriestley.
epriestley edited edge metadata.
epriestley added inline comments.
src/docs/user/configuration/notifications.diviner
121

"this approaching" -> "this approach"

121

"is termination" -> "is terminated"

121–125

This argument isn't terribly compelling, since you're trading 2 config options for a page of them. Maybe emphasize that you don't have to duplicate configuration or similar. (This setup simply seems more complicated to me, though.)

One-point-five things that might be worth mentioning:

  • You don't have to open up a separate port.
  • Same deal, but clients don't need to be able to connect to a weird port.
127

Maybe mention that these paths are examples or something -- we really should not have to do this, but users are crazily excited about taking everything literally.

145

One downside to this approach is that you'll send authentication cookies to the Node server. Although it seems unlikely that an attacker could gain any kind of access which would make this relevant, I figured I'd mention it.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jan 9 2015, 12:32 AM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.