<cburroughs> Would it be reasonable for the diffusion audit emails to say "christopher raised a concern with this commit by FOO" instead of just "christopher raised a concern with this commit"?  Looking for ways to get more context instead of doing @whatever to address comments, since that ought to be implicit from who wrote the commit, but that information isn't in the email
<epriestley> cburroughs: I think that's reasonable, do you want to file something?
<cburroughs> Sure I'll make a ticket
<epriestley> cburroughs: the slightly easier and slightly more consistent approach would be to add "AUTHOR" or "GUILTY PARTIES" under the comment part, and list the author/committer/pusher -- does that seem OK (specifically, if the info is below the comment text?)
<cburroughs> Yep that seems good