aphlict build` workflow.
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by joshuaspence on May 30 2014, 9:54 AM.

Details

Reviewers

epriestley

Group Reviewers

Blessed Reviewers

Commits

Restricted Diffusion Commit
rPddf5412cbbfd: Add a `./bin/aphlict build` workflow.

Summary

Currently, it is a bit tricky to build the Aphlict client SWF from the ActionScript source. Provide a ./bin/aphlict build workflow that simplifies this process.

Depends on D9226.

Test Plan

Executed the workflow:

> ./bin/aphlict build
Done.

Diff Detail

Repository

rP Phabricator

Lint

Lint Skipped

Unit

Tests Skipped

Event Timeline

joshuaspence updated this revision to Diff 22244.May 30 2014, 9:54 AM

joshuaspence retitled this revision from to Add a `./bin/aphlict build` workflow..

joshuaspence updated this object.

joshuaspence edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

joshuaspence added a reviewer: epriestley.

joshuaspence added a parent revision: D9226: Make `./bin/aphlict` behave more like a service..

Herald added a reviewer: Blessed Reviewers. · View Herald TranscriptMay 30 2014, 9:54 AM

Herald added subscribers: Korvin, epriestley. · View Herald Transcript

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B793: Diff 22244.May 30 2014, 9:55 AM

Does this need the --strict flag too now?

Yep you're right. Will fix.

Rebase

One thing I really hate (not quite related to this diff) is that the build process is not idempotent.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B883: Diff 22421.Jun 5 2014, 7:35 PM

Summarizing from IRC:

mxmlc embeds some kind of timestamp or something into the binaries.
gzuncompress()'ing the .SWF after stripping the header gives binaries differing by 3 bytes in a nonobvious way (i.e., not an easily identifiable timestamp in an XML section or anything like that).
-raw-metadata '' didn't get rid of this either.
Least bad way forward for now seems to be just living with it.