See PHI1334. The existing coverage for "<table>" in remarkup is all testing valid inputs, and we have some incorrect method call names when the input isn't valid.
Add coverage, then make it pass.
 Differential  D20644  
Improve coverage of remarkup "<table>" rule and fix some bad method calls Authored by epriestley on Jul 8 2019, 11:55 PM. Tags None Referenced Files 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Subscribers None Tokens 
Details See PHI1334. The existing coverage for "<table>" in remarkup is all testing valid inputs, and we have some incorrect method call names when the input isn't valid. Add coverage, then make it pass. Added tests and made them pass. Rendered some questionable <table>-like tags in comment previews. 
Diff Detail 
 Event TimelineComment Actions I'm going to fast-track this to production since the fatal in PHI1334 is particularly unlucky (repository landing page) and I'm pretty confident the change doesn't make anything worse.  |