Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix member edit transaction validation so it works for both implicit and explicit account creation
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Apr 14 2017, 4:58 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F19387539: D17692.id.diff
Sat, Dec 27, 3:47 AM
F19357457: D17692.id42546.diff
Fri, Dec 26, 7:50 AM
F19196882: D17692.diff
Tue, Dec 16, 1:23 PM
F19061857: D17692.diff
Nov 29 2025, 1:53 PM
F18998077: D17692.diff
Nov 20 2025, 5:19 PM
F18984909: D17692.id.diff
Nov 17 2025, 12:48 PM
F18854665: D17692.diff
Nov 1 2025, 12:26 AM
F18831636: D17692.diff
Oct 25 2025, 1:52 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T12451. Ref T12484. This should deal with all the + / - / = cases correctly, I think.

Also makes sure that members are real users, not commits or tokens or whatever. And expands the creation test case to make some other basic sanity checks.

Test Plan
  • Went through implicit first-time creation flow.
  • Went through explicit second-time creation flow.
  • Unit test now passes.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable