Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix member edit transaction validation so it works for both implicit and explicit account creation
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Apr 14 2017, 4:58 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F19061857: D17692.diff
Sat, Nov 29, 1:53 PM
F18998077: D17692.diff
Thu, Nov 20, 5:19 PM
F18984909: D17692.id.diff
Mon, Nov 17, 12:48 PM
F18854665: D17692.diff
Nov 1 2025, 12:26 AM
F18831636: D17692.diff
Oct 25 2025, 1:52 PM
F18810845: D17692.diff
Oct 19 2025, 11:43 PM
F18508741: D17692.id.diff
Sep 5 2025, 2:59 AM
F18500857: D17692.diff
Sep 4 2025, 9:22 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T12451. Ref T12484. This should deal with all the + / - / = cases correctly, I think.

Also makes sure that members are real users, not commits or tokens or whatever. And expands the creation test case to make some other basic sanity checks.

Test Plan
  • Went through implicit first-time creation flow.
  • Went through explicit second-time creation flow.
  • Unit test now passes.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable