See D13066#136978. In my test plan, the text Fixes T8042 appeared in a code block. This caused a transaction to be added to revision, which was not expected.
Description
Description
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
I've changed the test plan of D13066 now, but here is the original text that triggered the transaction being created:
> echo '{"ids": [1]}' | arc --conduit-uri='http://phabricator.local' call-conduit differential.getrevisiontransactions{"error":null,"errorMessage":null,"response":{"1":[{"revisionID":"1","transactionPHID":"PHID-XACT-DREV-3ky27dskqgm7olm","transactionType":"core:comment","oldValue":null,"newValue":null,"comments":"test","authorPHID":"PHID-USER-t2codh7fptz7kambtqja","dateCreated":"1432872808"},{"revisionID":"1","transactionPHID":"PHID-XACT-DREV-vatzg7h2wgqtgvf","transactionType":"core:customfield","oldValue":null,"newValue":"Added some unit tests.","comments":null,"authorPHID":"PHID-USER-t2codh7fptz7kambtqja","dateCreated":"1432872777"},{"revisionID":"1","transactionPHID":"PHID-XACT-DREV-cu4o5tmapyjm7hy","transactionType":"core:customfield","oldValue":null,"newValue":"Fixes T8042. Changes the way that `PhutilUnitTestEngine` discovers unit tests. In particular, if you only modify a single test case then there is no reason to run all other test cases within the same directory (which is the current behavior).","comments":null,"authorPHID":"PHID-USER-t2codh7fptz7kambtqja","dateCreated":"1432872777"},{"revisionID":"1","transactionPHID":"PHID-XACT-DREV-t4comgio46ldswu","transactionType":"core:customfield","oldValue":"","newValue":"Allow PhutilUnitTestEngine to execute tests from a single path","comments":null,"authorPHID":"PHID-USER-t2codh7fptz7kambtqja","dateCreated":"1432872777"},{"revisionID":"1","transactionPHID":"PHID-XACT-DREV-r7it7bs5wemd5o3","transactionType":"differential:update","oldValue":null,"newValue":"PHID-DIFF-uv2jmbypa3imjeggh3hl","comments":null,"authorPHID":"PHID-USER-t2codh7fptz7kambtqja","dateCreated":"1432872777"}]}}