(Slightly artificial, but fully descriptive example)
[[ http://example.org/dictionary/super | super ]]fluous
results in
[[ http://example.org/dictionary/super | super ]]fluous
Expected result:
superfluous (where the underlined text is the link)
(Slightly artificial, but fully descriptive example)
[[ http://example.org/dictionary/super | super ]]fluous
results in
[[ http://example.org/dictionary/super | super ]]fluous
Expected result:
superfluous (where the underlined text is the link)
The example is pretty descriptive, I'd say. Because of linking to the description of that exact part of the word.
Or another example from real life - when describing existing behavior, cf. https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T142927 description
The use case in that linked task is "using Remarkup to demonstrate the behavior of a different markup language", which isn't something we expect Remarkup to support.