Like git, it is also valid to have empty net change under hg. Should not throw if that is the case.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
epriestley lifeihuang - Group Reviewers
Blessed Reviewers - Commits
- rARCc4ec22b140db: It should be also valid to have empty change under hg
Tried on a hg repo.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rARC Arcanist
- Lint
Lint Skipped - Unit
Tests Skipped
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Flag seems unrelated? Other fix is fine.
src/workflow/ArcanistDiffWorkflow.php | ||
---|---|---|
397–401 ↗ | (On Diff #21084) | Unrelated? |
Comment Actions
Ah I actually want to make that change but did not mean to put it in this change.
Anyway since it's already there, I'll live with it. The reason we want that is that we try to use arc
in some automated tools and sometimes the generated code could exceed the limit.
Comment Actions
I'll accept the hg change, but I think we should separate out the other flag. See also T4924. I'd like to understand the larger context.
Comment Actions
Closed by commit rARCc4ec22b140db (authored by @sowedance, committed by @epriestley).