Page MenuHomePhabricator

Fix an issue where prose diffing may fail after hitting the PCRE backtracking limit
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Jul 23 2020, 2:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F14759148: D21422.diff
Wed, Jan 22, 11:24 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jan 21, 9:51 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Jan 17, 10:24 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jan 8, 1:57 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Dec 31, 6:39 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Dec 29, 4:17 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Dec 26, 5:41 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 18 2024, 9:21 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Fixes T13554. For certain prose diff inputs and PCRE backtracking limits, this regular expression may back track too often and fail.

A characteristic input is "x x x x ...", i.e. many sequences where (.*?)\s*\z looks like it may be able to match but actually can not.

I think writing an expression which has all the behavior we'd like without this backtracking issue isn't trivial (at least, I don't think I know how to do it offhand); just use a strategy based on "trim()" insetad, which avoids any PCRE complexities here.

Test Plan

Locally, this passes the "x x x ..." test which the previous code failed. I'm not including that test because it won't reproduce across values of "pcre.backtrac_limit", PCRE versions, etc.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Jul 23 2020, 2:46 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.