Page MenuHomePhabricator

Remove inconsistent and confusing use of the term "multiplex" in mail
ClosedPublic

Authored by epriestley on Feb 5 2018, 6:40 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F18773951: D18994.id45559.diff
Thu, Oct 9, 1:54 PM
F18770633: D18994.id.diff
Wed, Oct 8, 1:49 PM
F18575421: D18994.diff
Sep 10 2025, 1:12 PM
F18566547: D18994.id.diff
Sep 9 2025, 2:43 PM
F18502057: D18994.diff
Sep 4 2025, 10:09 PM
F18217126: D18994.id45547.diff
Aug 19 2025, 8:30 AM
F18208018: D18994.id.diff
Aug 18 2025, 7:47 PM
F18196070: D18994.diff
Aug 17 2025, 5:03 PM
Subscribers
None

Details

Summary

Ref T13053. Because I previously misunderstood what "multiplex" means, I used it in various contradictory and inconsistent ways.

We can send mail in two ways: either one mail to everyone with a big "To" and a big "Cc" (not default; better for mailing lists) or one mail to each recipient with just them in "To" (default; better for almost everything else).

"Multiplexing" is combining multiple signals over a single channel, so it more accurately describes the big to/cc. However, it is sometimes used to descibe the other approach. Since it's ambiguous and I've tainted it through misuse, get rid of it and use more clear language.

(There's still some likely misuse in the SMS stuff, and a couple of legitimate uses in other contexts.)

Test Plan

Grepped for multiplex, saw less of it.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP Phabricator
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable